ArticleProteins2021
Physics-based protein structure refinement in the era of artificial intelligence.
Article in Proteins, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Structural quality-tier assessment for TCR-pMHC functional enrichment.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- The Roles of EDA2R in Ageing and Disease.Aging cell · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Computational Approaches in the Development of Anticancer Drugs.Cancers · 2024Article
- Efficient Refinement of Complex Structures of Flexible Histone Peptides Using Post-Docking Molecular Dynamics Protocols.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Exploring the Alternative Conformation of a Known Protein Structure Based on Contact Map Prediction.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024Article
- Machine Learning-Based Modeling of Olfactory Receptors in Their Inactive State: Human OR51E2 as a Case Study.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023Article
- Improvement of protein tertiary and quaternary structure predictions using the ReFOLD refinement method and the AlphaFold2 recycling process.Bioinformatics advances · 2023Article
- Protein Function Analysis through Machine Learning.Biomolecules · 2022Review
- A-Prot: protein structure modeling using MSA transformer.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Ins and outs of AlphaFold2 transmembrane protein structure predictions.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2022Article
- Evaluation of model refinement in CASP14.Proteins · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Protein structure refinement is the last step in protein structure prediction pipelines. Physics-based refinement via molecular dynamics (MD) simulations has made significant progress during recent years. During CASP14, we tested a new refinement protocol based on an improved sampling strategy via MD simulations. MD simulations were carried out at an elevated temperature (360 K). An optimized use of biasing restraints and the use of multiple starting models led to enhanced sampling. The new protocol generally improved the model quality. In comparison with our previous protocols, the CASP14 protocol showed clear improvements. Our approach was successful with most initial models, many based on deep learning methods. However, we found that our approach was not able to refine machine-learning models from the AlphaFold2 group, often decreasing already high initial qualities. To better understand the role of refinement given new types of models based on machine-learning, a detailed analysis via MD simulations and Markov state modeling is presented here. We continue to find that MD-based refinement has the potential to improve AI predictions. We also identified several practical issues that make it difficult to realize that potential. Increasingly important is the consideration of inter-domain and oligomeric contacts in simulations; the presence of large kinetic barriers in refinement pathways also continues to present challenges. Finally, we provide a perspective on how physics-based refinement could continue to play a role in the future for improving initial predictions based on machine learning-based methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.