Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34156124›Full record

ArticleProteins2021

Physics-based protein structure refinement in the era of artificial intelligence.

Lim Heo, Giacomo Janson, Michael Feig

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteins, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Ins and outs of AlphaFold2 transmembrane protein structure predictions.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lim HeoDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Giacomo JansonDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Michael FeigDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9380-6422
Michigan State University · US

Funding

Modeling and dynamics of biomolecules on cellular scalesR35GM126948 · NIGMS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Michael Feig · 2018 to 2026
$3.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM126948
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein structure refinement is the last step in protein structure prediction pipelines. Physics-based refinement via molecular dynamics (MD) simulations has made significant progress during recent years. During CASP14, we tested a new refinement protocol based on an improved sampling strategy via MD simulations. MD simulations were carried out at an elevated temperature (360 K). An optimized use of biasing restraints and the use of multiple starting models led to enhanced sampling. The new protocol generally improved the model quality. In comparison with our previous protocols, the CASP14 protocol showed clear improvements. Our approach was successful with most initial models, many based on deep learning methods. However, we found that our approach was not able to refine machine-learning models from the AlphaFold2 group, often decreasing already high initial qualities. To better understand the role of refinement given new types of models based on machine-learning, a detailed analysis via MD simulations and Markov state modeling is presented here. We continue to find that MD-based refinement has the potential to improve AI predictions. We also identified several practical issues that make it difficult to realize that potential. Increasingly important is the consideration of inter-domain and oligomeric contacts in simulations; the presence of large kinetic barriers in refinement pathways also continues to present challenges. Finally, we provide a perspective on how physics-based refinement could continue to play a role in the future for improving initial predictions based on machine learning-based methods.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein ConformationProteinsSoftwareComputational BiologyMarkov ChainsPhysical PhenomenaProteinsCASPconformational samplingmachine learningMarkov state modelsmolecular dynamics simulationprotein structure predictionstructure refinement

Identifiers

PMID34156124
PMCPMC8616793
OpenAlexW3175014854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.