Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34155903›Full record

ArticleBone & joint open2021

Orthopaedic provider perceptions of virtual care : which providers prefer virtual care?

Nikhil R Yedulla, Zachary A Montgomery, Dylan S Koolmees, Eric B Battista, Charles S Day

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone & joint open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Carbon Footprint of In-person Versus Virtual Orthopaedic Care.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nikhil R YedullaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4173-5727
Zachary A MontgomeryDepartment of Orthopaedics, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8601-7174
Dylan S KoolmeesDepartment of Orthopaedics, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3194-8932
Eric B BattistaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8900-7433
Charles S DayDepartment of Orthopaedics, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0115-3805

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe purpose of our study was to determine which groups of orthopaedic providers favour virtual care, and analyze overall orthopaedic provider perceptions of virtual care. We hypothesize that providers with less clinical experience will favour virtual care, and that orthopaedic providers overall will show increased preference for virtual care during the COVID-19 pandemic and decreased preference during non-pandemic circumstances.

methodsAn orthopaedic research consortium at an academic medical system developed a survey examining provider perspectives regarding orthopaedic virtual care. Survey items were scored on a 1 to 5 Likert scale (1 = "strongly disagree", 5 = "strongly agree") and compared using nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test.

resultsProviders with less experience were more likely to recommend virtual care for follow-up visits (3.61 on the Likert scale (SD 0.95) vs 2.90 (SD 1.23); p = 0.006) and feel that virtual care was essential to patient wellbeing (3.98 (SD 0.95) vs 3.00 (SD 1.16); p < 0.001) during the pandemic. Less experienced providers also viewed virtual visits as providing a similar level of care as in-person visits (2.41 (SD 1.02) vs 1.76 (SD 0.87); p = 0.006) and more time-efficient than in-person visits (3.07 (SD 1.19) vs 2.34 (SD 1.14); p = 0.012) in non-pandemic circumstances. During the pandemic, most providers viewed virtual care as effective in providing essential care (83.6%, n = 51) and wanted to schedule patients for virtual care follow-up (82.2%, n = 50); only 10.9% (n = 8) of providers preferred virtual visits in non-pandemic circumstances.

conclusionOrthopaedic providers with less clinical experience seem to favourably view virtual care both during the pandemic and under non-pandemic circumstances. Providers in general appear to view virtual care positively during the pandemic but are less accommodating towards it in non-pandemic circumstances. Cite this article:

Indexed as

COVID-19TelemedicineVirtual care

Identifiers

PMID34155903
PMCPMC8244795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.