Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34155836›Full record

ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2021

Discrepancy between Cytology and Histology in Cervical Cancer Screening: a Multicenter Retrospective Study (KGOG 1040).

Yung Taek Ouh, Ji Jeong Park, Minjoo Kang, Miseon Kim, Jae Yun Song, So Jin Shin, Seung Hyuk Shim, Heon Jong Yoo, Maria Lee, Sung Jong Lee and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Diagnostic Accuracy of p16Analytical cellular pathology (Amsterdam) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.

Yung Taek OuhDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5887-4497
Ji Jeong ParkNational Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency (NECA), Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1905-5821
Minjoo KangNational Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency (NECA), Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1658-3389
Miseon KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5118-9275
Jae Yun SongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2752-5638
So Jin ShinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7432-6025
Seung Hyuk ShimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Konkuk University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8043-2257
Heon Jong YooDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4808-3450
Maria LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8017-3176
Sung Jong LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6077-2649
Whan ShinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yonsei University Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1050-2648
Gun Oh ChongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4887-4017
Min Chul ChoiComprehensive Gynecologic Cancer Center, CHA Bundang Medical Center, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4509-6731
Chel Hun ChoiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0199-6669
Kyung Jin MinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Korea. mikji78@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5783-4968
National Evidenc- based healthcare Collaborating Agency · KRCHA University Bundang Medical Center · KRCHA University Gangnam Medical Center · KRChungnam National University Hospital · KRKangwon National University · KRKeimyung University Dongsan Medical Center · KRKonkuk University Medical Center · KRKorea University · KRKorea University Medical Center · KRKyungpook National University Hospital · KRSamsung Medical Center · KRSeoul National University Hospital · KRThe Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital · KRYonsei University · KR

Funding

National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency NECA-A-19-007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCervical cancer is the fourth common cancer in women worldwide. The Papanicolau test is the primary screening procedure to detect abnormal cervical cells. Colposcopy is the main procedure for discriminating high-grade cervical lesions. The study aimed at clarifying the discrepancy between cervical cytology and colposcopic biopsy histology as well as confounding factors.

methodsEligible patients visited thirteen tertiary hospitals for colposcopic biopsy following cervical cytology and human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes between January and December 2018. Baseline characteristics including age, body mass index (BMI), and parity were collected.

resultsIn our study, 3,798 eligible patients were included. Mean age of patients was 42.7 (19-88) years and mean BMI was 22.5 (16.9-34.1) kg/m². The referred cervical cytologic findings consisted of 495 normal, 1,390 atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, 380 atypical squamous cells cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, 792 low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, 593 high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, 79 atypical glandular cells, 46 squamous cell carcinoma, and 23 adenocarcinoma. HPV-positive findings were found in 3,008 (79.2%) patients and were not detected in 914 (24.1%) cases. The risk of unexpected low-grade lesions from histology was higher in patients > 45 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.137; 95% confidence intervals [CIs], 1.475-3.096). In contrast, the risk of unexpected high-grade lesions from colposcopic biopsy was lower in patients ≥ 45 years (OR, 0.530; 95% CI, 0.367-0.747) and HPV 16/18 infection was higher than other HPV (OR, 1.848; 95% CI, 1.385-2.469).

conclusionAge and HPV genotypes were responsible for the discrepancies between cytology and histology. Precautions should be taken for women over the age of 45 in triage for colposcopy in order to avoid unnecessary testing.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiopsyCervix UteriColposcopyDNA, ViralEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHuman papillomavirus 16Human papillomavirus 18HumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesDNA, ViralCervical CytologyColposcopyDiscrepancyHistologyHPV

Identifiers

PMID34155836
PMCPMC8216990
OpenAlexW3171488105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.