Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34155662›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2021

Borrowing from supplemental sources to estimate causal effects from a primary data source.

Jeffrey A Boatman, David M Vock, Joseph S Koopmeiners

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Data Integration in Causal Inference.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Computational statistics
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jeffrey A BoatmanDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5019-8770
David M VockDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Joseph S KoopmeinersDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6147-3168

Funding

Women's CancerP30CA077598 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Douglas Yee · 1998 to 2026
$100.4M
VERY LOW NICOTINE CIGARETTES IN SMOKERS WITH SCHIZOPHRENIAU54DA031659 · NIDA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI LE, CHAP T. · 2011 to 2022
$64.7M
Innovative Statistical Methods for Evaluating the Impact of Tobacco Product StandardsR01DA046320 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Joseph S. Koopmeiners, David M. Vock · 2018 to 2026
$2.4M
SMART-ACT: Spatial Methodologic Approaches for Risk Assessment and Therapeutic Adaptation in Cancer TreatmentR01CA214825 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI CANAHUATE, GUADALUPE, FULLER, CLIFTON DAVID · 2017 to 2019
$1.1M
QuBBD: Precision E –Radiomics for Dynamic Big Head & Neck Cancer Data R01CA225190 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI CANAHUATE, GUADALUPE, FULLER, CLIFTON DAVID · 2017 to 2019
$776k
Innovative Statistical Methods for Detecting and Accounting for Non-Compliance in Randomized Trials of Very Low Nicotine Content CigarettesR03DA041870 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI KOOPMEINERS, JOSEPH S., VOCK, DAVID M. · 2016 to 2017
$229k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA077598NCI NIH HHS P30-CA077598NCI NIH HHS R01-CA214824NCI NIH HHS R01 CA214825NCI NIH HHS R01 CA225190NCI NIH HHS R01-CA225190NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA046320NIDA NIH HHS R01-DA046320NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA041870NIDA NIH HHS R03-DA041870NIDA NIH HHS U54 DA031659NIDA NIH HHS U54-DA031659
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing multiplicity of data sources offers exciting possibilities in estimating the effects of a treatment, intervention, or exposure, particularly if observational and experimental sources could be used simultaneously. Borrowing between sources can potentially result in more efficient estimators, but it must be done in a principled manner to mitigate increased bias and Type I error. Furthermore, when the effect of treatment is confounded, as in observational sources or in clinical trials with noncompliance, causal effect estimators are needed to simultaneously adjust for confounding and to estimate effects across data sources. We consider the problem of estimating causal effects from a primary source and borrowing from any number of supplemental sources. We propose using regression-based estimators that borrow based on assuming exchangeability of the regression coefficients and parameters between data sources. Borrowing is accomplished with multisource exchangeability models and Bayesian model averaging. We show via simulation that a Bayesian linear model and Bayesian additive regression trees both have desirable properties and borrow under appropriate circumstances. We apply the estimators to recently completed trials of very low nicotine content cigarettes investigating their impact on smoking behavior.

Indexed as

Tobacco ProductsBayes TheoremBiasCausalityComputer SimulationHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalBayesian additive regression treesBayesian linear modelBayesian model averagingborrowingcausal inferencemultisource exchangeability models

Identifiers

PMID34155662
PMCPMC11667477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.