ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2021
Neurocognitive subprocesses of working memory performance.
Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spectral and non-spectral EEG measures in the prediction of working memory task performance and psychopathology.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The effect of working memory load on interference inhibition in table tennis athletes: the moderating role of motor expertise.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- From the court to the heart: basketball intervention is associated with adolescents' subjective well-being-a serial mediation analysis of executive function and psychological capital.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Attenuated neural activity in processing decision-making feedback in uncertain conditions in patients with mild cognitive impairment.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2025Article
- Cognitive load impairs athletes' subliminal processing: behavioral and neural insights.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- The multidimensional relationship between alpha oscillations and cognition.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Task-related changes in aperiodic activity are related to visual working memory capacity independent of event-related potentials and alpha oscillations.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Athletes demonstrate an advantage in unconscious processing under working-memory load specifically within sport-related domains.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Alpha event-related decreases during encoding in adults with ADHD - An investigation of sustained attention and working memory processes.Behavioural brain research · 2024Article
- Neural dynamics underlying successful auditory short-term memory performance.The European journal of neuroscience · 2023Article
- Enhanced neural mechanisms of set shifting in musically trained adolescents and young adults: converging fMRI, EEG, and behavioral evidence.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
- Effects of Tai Chi on working memory in older adults: evidence from combined fNIRS and ERP.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2023Article
- The Functional Interactions between Cortical Regions through Theta-Gamma Coupling during Resting-State and a Visual Working Memory Task.Brain sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Working memory (WM) has been defined as the active maintenance and flexible updating of goal-relevant information in a form that has limited capacity and resists interference. Complex measures of WM recruit multiple subprocesses, making it difficult to isolate specific contributions of putatively independent subsystems. The present study was designed to determine whether neurophysiological indicators of proposed subprocesses of WM predict WM performance. We recruited 200 individuals defined by care-seeking status and measured neural responses using electroencephalography (EEG), while participants performed four WM tasks. We extracted spectral and time-domain EEG features from each task to quantify each of the hypothesized WM subprocesses: maintenance (storage of content), goal maintenance, and updating. We then used EEG measures of each subprocess as predictors of task performance to evaluate their contribution to WM. Significant predictors of WM capacity included contralateral delay activity and frontal theta, features typically associated with maintenance (storage of content) processes. In contrast, significant predictors of reaction time and its variability included contingent negative variation and the P3b, features typically associated with goal maintenance and updating. Broadly, these results suggest two principal dimensions that contribute to WM performance, tonic processes during maintenance contributing to capacity, and phasic processes during stimulus processing that contribute to response speed and variability. The analyses additionally highlight that reliability of features across tasks was greater (and comparable to that of WM performance) for features associated with stimulus processing (P3b and alpha), than with maintenance (gamma, theta and cross-frequency coupling).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.