Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34155563›Full record

SynthesisJournal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology2021

Failed Latarjet procedure: a systematic review of surgery revision options.

Matteo Buda, Riccardo D'Ambrosi, Enrico Bellato, Davide Blonna, Alessandro Cappellari, Giacomo Delle Rose, Giovanni Merolla, SICSeG (Italian Society of Shoulder, Elbow Surgery) Research Committee

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Recurrent Instability after the Latarjet Procedure.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Matteo BudaDivision of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Madre Teresa Di Calcutta Hospital, Monselice, Padova, Italy.
Riccardo D'AmbrosiIRCCS Orthopedic Institute Galeazzi, Milan, Italy. riccardo.dambrosi@hotmail.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1216-792X
Enrico BellatoDepartment of Surgical Sciences, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin Medical School, Turin, Italy.
Davide BlonnaOrthopaedic and Traumatology Department, University of Turin Medical School, Turin, Italy.
Alessandro CappellariDepartment of Orthopedics and Orthopedic Oncology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Giacomo Delle RoseShoulder and Elbow Unit, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Giovanni MerollaShoulder and Elbow Unit, Cervesi Hospital, Cattolica, AUSL Romagna, Cattolica, Italy.
SICSeG (Italian Society of Shoulder, Elbow Surgery) Research Committee
University of Turin · ITIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital · ITIstituto Ortopedico Galeazzi · ITOspedale Cervesi di Cattolica · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRevision surgery after the Latarjet procedure is a rare and challenging surgical problem, and various bony or capsular procedures have been proposed. This systematic review examines clinical and radiographic outcomes of different procedures for treating persistent pain or recurrent instability after a Latarjet procedure.

methodsA systematic review of the literature was performed using the Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, Google Scholar and Ovid databases with the combined keywords "failed", "failure", "revision", "Latarjet", "shoulder stabilization" and "shoulder instability" to identify articles published in English that deal with failed Latarjet procedures.

resultsA total of 11 studies (five retrospective and six case series investigations), all published between 2008 and 2020, fulfilled our inclusion criteria. For the study, 253 patients (254 shoulders, 79.8% male) with a mean age of 29.6 years (range: 16-54 years) were reviewed at an average follow-up of 51.5 months (range: 24-208 months).

conclusionsEden-Hybinette and arthroscopic capsuloplasty are the most popular and safe procedures to treat recurrent instability after a failed Latarjet procedure, and yield reasonable clinical outcomes. A bone graft procedure and capsuloplasty were proposed but there was no clear consensus on their efficacy and indication. Level of evidence Level IV Trial registration PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020185090- www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.

Indexed as

ReoperationArthroplastyHumansInfantJoint InstabilityRecurrenceShoulder JointTreatment FailureComplicationCoracoid transferEden–HybinetteFailed LatarjetRecurrent shoulder instabilityShoulder stabilization

Identifiers

PMID34155563
PMCPMC8217356
OpenAlexW3176430195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.