Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34155550›Full record

ReviewSkeletal radiology2022

Periarticular calcifications.

Y Y Yan, Y N Bin Dous, H A Ouellette, P L Munk, N Murray, P I Mallinson, M A Sheikh

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Skeletal radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Imaging mimickers of MSK infection.Skeletal radiology · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Y Y YanDepartment of Radiology, Musculoskeletal Section, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. yanyetyen@gmail.com.
Y N Bin DousDepartment of Radiology, Musculoskeletal Section, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
H A OuelletteDepartment of Radiology, Musculoskeletal Section, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
P L MunkDepartment of Radiology, Musculoskeletal Section, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
N MurrayDepartment of Radiology, Musculoskeletal Section, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
P I MallinsonDepartment of Radiology, Musculoskeletal Section, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
M A SheikhDepartment of Radiology, Musculoskeletal Section, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Periarticular calcification and ossification is a frequent finding on imaging and may sometimes pose a diagnostic challenge. The differential diagnoses for this radiological finding are wide and can be classified into broad groups such as idiopathic, developmental, trauma, burns, infection, tumor, connective tissue disease, crystalline, metabolic, vascular, and foreign bodies. With careful consideration of the clinical and imaging findings as well as awareness of mimickers of periarticular mineralization, the list of differential diagnoses can be narrowed down. This article aims to review the clinical-radiologic findings of periarticular calcified or ossified lesions with relevant imaging illustrations.

Indexed as

CalcinosisOsteoarthritisDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansCalcified malignancyCalcinosisOssificationPeriarticular mineralizationSynovial sarcoma

Identifiers

PMID34155550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.