Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34155400›Full record

ReviewNature neuroscience2021

Formalizing planning and information search in naturalistic decision-making.

L T Hunt, N D Daw, P Kaanders, M A MacIver, U Mugan, E Procyk, A D Redish, E Russo, J Scholl, K Stachenfeld and 2 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Predictive pursuit emerges in high-dimensional recurrent neural networks.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Learning to select computations in recurrent neural circuits.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Reappraising intuitions about consciousness.Frontiers in psychology · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Replay in the human visual cortex during brief task pauses is linked to implicit learning of successor representations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

L T HuntDepartment of Psychiatry, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. laurence.hunt@psych.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8393-8533
N D DawPrinceton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5029-1430
P KaandersDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
M A MacIverCenter for Robotics and Biosystems, Department of Neurobiology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3711-8235
U MuganCenter for Robotics and Biosystems, Department of Neurobiology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5824-7028
E ProcykUniv Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, INSERM, Stem Cell and Brain Research Institute U1208, Bron, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7486-4993
A D RedishDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3644-9072
E RussoDepartment of Theoretical Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6215-6305
J SchollDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9969-1355
K StachenfeldDeepMind, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6936-4257
C R E WilsonUniv Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, INSERM, Stem Cell and Brain Research Institute U1208, Bron, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9497-919X
N KollingDepartment of Psychiatry, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. nils.kolling@psych.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0283-6966

Funding

CRCNS: Computational and neural mechanisms of memory-guided decisionsR01DA038891 · NIDA · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI DAW, NATHANIEL DOUGLASS, SHOHAMY, DAPHNA · 2014 to 2018
$1.7M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R010803/1Medical Research Council MR/N014448/1NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA038891Wellcome Trust 208789/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decisions made by mammals and birds are often temporally extended. They require planning and sampling of decision-relevant information. Our understanding of such decision-making remains in its infancy compared with simpler, forced-choice paradigms. However, recent advances in algorithms supporting planning and information search provide a lens through which we can explain neural and behavioral data in these tasks. We review these advances to obtain a clearer understanding for why planning and curiosity originated in certain species but not others; how activity in the medial temporal lobe, prefrontal and cingulate cortices may support these behaviors; and how planning and information search may complement each other as means to improve future action selection.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDecision MakingNeurosciencesAnimalsHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.