Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34155363›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2021

Genome-wide cell-free DNA screening: a focus on copy-number variants.

Jill Rafalko, Erica Soster, Samantha Caldwell, Eyad Almasri, Thomas Westover, Vivian Weinblatt, Philip Cacheris

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jill RafalkoLaboratory Corporation of America, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3241-9781
Erica SosterLaboratory Corporation of America, La Jolla, CA, USA. erica.soster@labcorp.com.
Samantha CaldwellLaboratory Corporation of America, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Eyad AlmasriLaboratory Corporation of America, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Thomas WestoverDepartment of Maternal Fetal Medicine and Perinatal Genetics, Capital Health System, Trenton, NJ, USA.
Vivian WeinblattLaboratory Corporation of America, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Philip CacherisLaboratory Corporation of America, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Leco Corporation (United States) · USCapital Health · USLabCorp (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOf 86,902 prenatal genome-wide cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening tests, 4,121 were positive for a chromosome abnormality. This study examines 490 cases screen-positive for one or more subchromosomal copy-number variants (CNV) from genome-wide cfDNA screening.

methodsCases positive for one or more subchromosomal CNV from genome-wide cfDNA screening and diagnostic outcomes were compiled. Diagnostic testing trends were analyzed, positive predictive values (PPVs) were calculated, and the type of chromosomal abnormalities ultimately confirmed by diagnostic testing were described.

resultsCNVs were identified in 0.56% of screened specimens. Of the 490 cases screen-positive for one or more CNV, diagnostic outcomes were available for 244 cases (50%). The overall PPV among the cases with diagnostic outcomes was 74.2% (95% CI: 68.1-79.5%) and 71.8% (95% CI: 65.5-77.4%) for "fetal-only" events. Overall, isolated CNVs showed a lower PPV of 61.0% (95% CI: 52.5-68.8%) compared to complex CNVs at 93.9% (95% CI: 86.6-97.5%). Isolated deletions/duplications and unbalanced structural rearrangements were the most common diagnostic outcomes when isolated and complex CNVs were identified by cfDNA screening, respectively.

conclusionGenome-wide cfDNA screening identifies chromosomal abnormalities beyond the scope of traditional cfDNA screening, and the overall PPV associated with subchromosomal CNVs in cases with diagnostic outcomes was >70%.

Indexed as

Cell-Free Nucleic AcidsChromosome DisordersNoninvasive Prenatal TestingChromosome AberrationsDNA Copy Number VariationsFemaleHumansPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisCell-Free Nucleic Acids

Identifiers

PMID34155363
PMCPMC8486654
OpenAlexW3175602896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.