Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34155237›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

The effect of COVID19 pandemic restrictions on an urban rodent population.

Miguel A Bedoya-Pérez, Michael P Ward, Max Loomes, Iain S McGregor, Mathew S Crowther

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Computational Urban Ecology of New York City Rats.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Older urban rats are infected with the zoonotic nematodeCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Miguel A Bedoya-PérezBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia. miguel.bedoyaperez@sydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-2081-4485
Michael P WardSydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, Sydney, NSW, 2570, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9921-4986
Max LoomesBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1042-0968
Iain S McGregorBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9307-7159
Mathew S CrowtherSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8968-1161
The University of Sydney · AU

Funding

The Council of the City of Sydney 2019/609066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shortly after the enactment of restrictions aimed at limiting the spread of COVID-19, various local government and public health authorities around the world reported an increased sighting of rats. Such reports have yet to be empirically validated. Here we combined data from multi-catch rodent stations (providing data on rodent captures), rodent bait stations (providing data on rodent activity) and residents' complaints to explore the effects of a six week lockdown period on rodent populations within the City of Sydney, Australia. The sampling interval encompassed October 2019 to July 2020 with lockdown defined as the interval from April 1st to May 15th, 2020. Rodent captures and activity (visits to bait stations) were stable prior to lockdown. Captures showed a rapid increase and then decline during the lockdown, while rodent visits to bait stations declined throughout this period. There were no changes in the frequency of complaints during lockdown relative to before and after lockdown. There was a non-directional change in the geographical distribution of indices of rodent abundance suggesting that rodents redistributed in response to resource scarcity. We hypothesize that lockdown measures initially resulted in increased rodent captures due to sudden shortage of human-derived food resources. Rodent visits to bait stations might not show this pattern due to the nature of the binary data collected, namely the presence or absence of a visit. Relocation of bait stations driven by pest management goals may also have affected the detection of any directional spatial effect. We conclude that the onset of COVID-19 may have disrupted commensal rodent populations, with possible implications for the future management of these ubiquitous urban indicator species.

Indexed as

SARS-CoV-2AnimalsAustraliaCitiesCOVID-19FoodHumansPandemicsPest ControlQuarantineRatsUrban Population

Identifiers

PMID34155237
PMCPMC8217515
OpenAlexW3173837626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.