Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34155224›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Stress distribution of different lumbar posterior pedicle screw insertion techniques: a combination study of finite element analysis and biomechanical test.

Mingzhi Song, Kebin Sun, Zhonghai Li, Junwei Zong, Xiliang Tian, Kai Ma, Shouyu Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Letter to the editor concerning "Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation with anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a comparison of postoperative outcomes" by Levy HA, et al. (Eur Spine J [2024]: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08412-5).European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A systematic comparison between FEBio and PolyFEM for biomechanical systems.Computer methods and programs in biomedicine · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mingzhi SongDepartment of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, No.222 Zhongshan Road, Xigang District, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Kebin SunCollege of Information Engineering, Dalian University, No.10 Xuefu Avenue, Economic & Technical Development Zone, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Zhonghai LiDepartment of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, No.222 Zhongshan Road, Xigang District, Dalian, Liaoning, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4735-1193
Junwei ZongDepartment of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, No.222 Zhongshan Road, Xigang District, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Xiliang TianDepartment of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, No.222 Zhongshan Road, Xigang District, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Kai MaDepartment of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, No.222 Zhongshan Road, Xigang District, Dalian, Liaoning, China. dmu_makai@sina.com.
Shouyu WangDepartment of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, No.222 Zhongshan Road, Xigang District, Dalian, Liaoning, China. dmuwsy@sina.com.
Dalian Medical University · CNDalian University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At present, the pedicle screw is the most commonly used internal fixation device. However, there are many kinds of common posterior pedicle screw insertion techniques performed to reconstruct the lumbar stability. Therefore, spinal surgeons often face a difficult choice. The stress distribution of internal fixation system is an important index for evaluating safety. Unfortunately, little had been known about the difference of stress distribution of screw-rod systems that established by Roy-Camille, Magerl and Krag insertion techniques. Here, combination of finite element analysis and model measurement research was adopted to evaluate the difference of stress. Following different pedicle screw insertion techniques, three lumbar posterior surgery models were established after modeling and validation of the L1-S1 vertebrae finite element model. By analyzing the data, we found that stress concentration phenomenon was in all the postoperative models. Roy-Camille and Magerl insertion techniques led to the great stress on screw-rod systems. Then, fresh frozen calf spines were selected as a model for subsequent measurements. Fitted with a specially designed test pedicle screw, L5-L6 vertebrae were selected to repeat and verify the results of the finite element analysis. With the aid of universal testing machine and digital torque wrench, models simulated flexion, extension, lateral bending and rotation. Finally, the strain value was captured by the strain gauge and was then calculated as the stress value. Krag and Magerl were found to be the safer choice for pedicle screw insertion. Overall, our combination method obtained the reliable result that Krag insertion technique was the safer approach for pedicle screw implantation due to its relatively dispersive stress. Therefore, without the consideration of screw size, pedicle fill, bone density, and bone structures, we recommend the Krag insertion technique as the first choice to reconstruction of lumbar stability. Additionally, the combination method of finite element analysis and strain gauge measurement can provide a feasible way to study the stress distribution of spinal internal fixation.

Indexed as

Pedicle ScrewsStress, MechanicalBiomechanical PhenomenaElastic ModulusFinite Element AnalysisFracture Fixation, InternalHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalLumbar VertebraeModels, AnatomicRadiographyReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID34155224
PMCPMC8217271
OpenAlexW3175926946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.