Trial reportBlood cancer journal2021
Detection of minimal residual disease by next generation sequencing in AL amyloidosis.
Trial report in Blood cancer journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic utility of immunofixation and free light chain assay in AL amyloidosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Blood advances · 2026Pooled it
- Minimal residual disease in systemic light chain amyloidosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Diagnostic Performance of the New Free Light Chain Ratio in Systemic Amyloidosis.JACC. CardioOncology · 2025Article
- Autologous stem cell transplantation in AL amyloidosis: Muddy waters.Blood reviews · 2024Review
- Bad players in AL amyloidosis in the current era of treatment.Expert review of hematology · 2023Article
- Article
- Systemic amyloid light-chain amyloidosis beyond ANDROMEDA: Diagnostic challenges and therapeutic updates.CA: a cancer journal for cliniciansReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.