Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Thibaut DevièseOxford Radiocarbon Unit, Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QY, United Kingdom; deviese@cerege.fr gregory.abrams@scladina.be.ORCID 0000-0003-0495-7398
Mateja HajdinjakDepartment of Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Stéphane PirsonDirection Scientifique et Technique, Agence Wallonne du Patrimoine, 5100 Namur, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2955-0383
Isabelle De GrooteDepartment of Archaeology, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9860-0180
Kévin Di ModicaScladina Cave Archaeological Centre, 5300 Andenne, Belgium.
Michel ToussaintAssociation Wallonne d'Études Mégalithiques, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Valentin FischerEvolution & Diversity Dynamics Lab, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8808-6747
Dan ComeskeyOxford Radiocarbon Unit, Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QY, United Kingdom.
Luke SpindlerOxford Radiocarbon Unit, Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QY, United Kingdom.
Matthias MeyerDepartment of Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Patrick SemalScientific Heritage Service, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
Tom HighamOxford Radiocarbon Unit, Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QY, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5949-598X
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
NeanderthalsAnimalsCavesFossilsGenomicsRadiometric Dating
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Reply to Van Peer: Direct radiocarbon dating and ancient genomic analysis reveal the true age of the Neanderthals at Spy Cave. · full record | OpenQuestion