Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34155098›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Photovoltaic-driven microbial protein production can use land and sunlight more efficiently than conventional crops.

Dorian Leger, Silvio Matassa, Elad Noor, Alon Shepon, Ron Milo, Arren Bar-Even

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Toward Solar-Powered Growth of AutotrophicJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Multistep catalytic abiotic COProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Techno-Economic Assessment of Electromicrobial Production ofEnvironmental science & technology · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dorian LegerSystems and Synthetic Metabolism, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, 14476 Potsdam, Germany; dorian.dleger@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4492-2766
Silvio MatassaDepartment of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, 80125 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7232-6331
Elad NoorDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, 7610001 Rehovot, Israel.
Alon SheponDepartment of Environmental Studies, The Porter School of the Environment and Earth Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-4345-8957
Ron MiloDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, 7610001 Rehovot, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-1641-2299
Arren Bar-EvenSystems and Synthetic Metabolism, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, 14476 Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1039-4328

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Population growth and changes in dietary patterns place an ever-growing pressure on the environment. Feeding the world within sustainable boundaries therefore requires revolutionizing the way we harness natural resources. Microbial biomass can be cultivated to yield protein-rich feed and food supplements, collectively termed single-cell protein (SCP). Yet, we still lack a quantitative comparison between traditional agriculture and photovoltaic-driven SCP systems in terms of land use and energetic efficiency. Here, we analyze the energetic efficiency of harnessing solar energy to produce SCP from air and water. Our model includes photovoltaic electricity generation, direct air capture of carbon dioxide, electrosynthesis of an electron donor and/or carbon source for microbial growth (hydrogen, formate, or methanol), microbial cultivation, and the processing of biomass and proteins. We show that, per unit of land, SCP production can reach an over 10-fold higher protein yield and at least twice the caloric yield compared with any staple crop. Altogether, this quantitative analysis offers an assessment of the future potential of photovoltaic-driven microbial foods to supplement conventional agricultural production and support resource-efficient protein supply on a global scale.

Indexed as

Solar EnergySunlightAnimalsBacterial ProteinsCrops, AgriculturalDietary ProteinsEnergy TransferHumansBacterial ProteinsDietary Proteinssingle cell proteinselectrochemistryfood securitymicrobial proteinphotovoltaicssingle-cell protein

Identifiers

PMID34155098
PMCPMC8255800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.