ArticleIndian heart journal
Clinical and echocardiographic predictors of outcomes in patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy: A single centre, six month follow-up study.
Article in Indian heart journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Peripartum cardiomyopathy in an intensive care unit setting.World journal of critical care medicine · 2026Review
- Aims and Rationale of a National Registry Integrating Clinical, Echocardiographic, and Multi-Omics Profiling to Promote Precision Medicine in Peripartum Cardiomyopathy.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy and Peripartum Cardiomyopathy: A Meta-Analysis of Prevalence and Impact on Left Ventricular Function and Mortality.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- The Advances in Utilizing Right Ventricular Function as a Predictor of Peripartum Cardiomyopathy Recovery: A Single Centre Prospective Cohort Study.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
- Peripartum cardiomyopathy: a comprehensive and contemporary review.Heart failure reviews · 2024Review
- Transient Left Ventricular Dysfunction from Cardiomyopathies to Myocardial Viability: When and Why Cardiac Function Recovers.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Thromboembolism in peripartum cardiomyopathy: a systematic review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Review
- The "arrhythmic" presentation of peripartum cardiomyopathy: case series and critical review of the literature.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Using Echocardiography and Biomarkers to Determine Prognosis in Peripartum Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPeripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) is an important cause of maternal mortality and morbidity. But, there is a paucity of prospective data on outcomes and prognostic markers in patients receiving contemporary evidence-based therapy, particularly in developing countries.
methodsThis was a single centre, prospective, cohort study on 43 PPCM patients who were followed for 6 months. The primary endpoint was a composite incidence of decompensation related re-hospitalization, all-cause death, and poor recovery (defined as left ventricular ejection fraction, LVEF: <45% at 6 months). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the independent predictors and Kaplan-Meier plots for event (re-hospitalization or death) free survival were computed at their optimal cut-offs.
resultsMean LVEF at presentation was 34.7%. Two patients died during index hospitalization but there were no deaths during follow-up and 63.4% of patients had full LV recovery after discharge. 32.5% of the study population experienced the composite endpoint with high left atrial volume index (LAVi), and low right ventricular fractional area change (RVFAC) at presentation as independent predictors. Use of Inotropic therapy during index hospitalization (with dobutamine or levosimendan) and bromocriptine therapy were not associated with better outcome.
conclusionsAt the end of 6 months after PPCM diagnosis, about 61% of patients had full LV functional recovery with a mortality rate of 4.7%. RVFAC (<31.4% with 86% accuracy) and LAVi (>29.6 ml/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.