ArticleChild and adolescent psychiatry and mental health2021
Pivoting in the pandemic: a qualitative study of child and adolescent psychiatrists in the times of COVID-19.
Article in Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Shared realities, therapeutic settings, and countertransference in times of crisis: a multinational qualitative study of psychotherapists' experiences.BMC psychology · 2025Article
- Child and adolescent mental health during the Covid-19 pandemic: an overview of key findings from a thematic series.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2025Review
- 'We tried our best... it wasn't great': a qualitative study of clinician experiences on child psychiatry wards at the height of COVID-19.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Pathways and identity: toward qualitative research careers in child and adolescent psychiatry.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2024Article
- Posttraumatic growth of medical staff during COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Evaluation of the rapid implementation of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study among adolescents and their parents.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2023Article
- Qualitative methods in child and adolescent psychiatry: the time has come.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2022Article
- The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Mental Health Care of Children and Adolescents in Switzerland: Results of a Survey among Mental Health Care Professionals after One Year of COVID-19.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Neuroethics in the Era of Teleneurology.Seminars in neurology · 2022Article
- Mental Health in the Medical Home: A Longitudinal Curriculum for Pediatric Residents on Behavioral and Mental Health Care.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2022Article
- Clinical practice during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study among child and adolescent psychiatrists across the world.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesWe examined the personal and professional impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the development, practice, and shifting values of child and adolescent psychiatrists (CAP), in order to inform how the field may move forward post-pandemic.
methodsWe conducted individual semi-structured interviews of child and adolescent psychiatrists (n = 24) practicing in the United States. Participants were selected as a diverse purposive sample of active members of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (AACAP). We analyzed anonymized transcripts through iterative coding using thematic analysis aided by NVivo software.
resultsWe identified three main thematic domains within participants' response to the pandemic, which have engendered a reevaluation of and a recommitment to the aims of each clinician and the field of CAP more broadly. These domains, paired with representative questions, include: (1) Unsettling, or "who have we been?" (identifying discontents such as daily inefficiencies and intraprofessional loss of trust); (2) Adaptation, or "who are we now?" (exploring affordances and limitations of virtual work, and the evolution of personal and professional identity); and (3) Reimagination, or "who will we become?" (renewing a commitment to psychiatry as advocacy). Even as we identified a collective agreement toward the need for implementing change, just what needs to change, and how that change will be realized, remain contested.
conclusionThese three thematic domains, augmented by a national confrontation with race and equity, have engendered a field-wide reckoning with known inequities. They have reinvigorated collective responses and calls to action. The divergent mindsets to change and leadership have provided an aperture for what values and practices the field might instill in its next generation of practitioners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.