Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34154592›Full record

ReviewBMC health services research2021

Place4Carers: a multi-method participatory study to co-design, piloting, and transferring a novel psycho-social service for engaging family caregivers in remote rural settings.

Guendalina Graffigna, Eleonora Gheduzzi, Niccolò Morelli, Serena Barello, Massimo Corbo, Valeria Ginex, Roberta Ferrari, Andrea Lascioli, Carolina Feriti, Cristina Masella

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Patient Engagement in Oncology Practice: A Qualitative Study on Patients' and Nurses' Perspectives.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Guendalina GraffignaDepartment of Psychology, EngageMinds HUB Research Center, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Eleonora GheduzziDepartment of Management Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Niccolò MorelliDepartment of Psychology, EngageMinds HUB Research Center, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Serena BarelloDepartment of Psychology, EngageMinds HUB Research Center, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Milano, Milan, Italy. serena.barello@unicatt.it.
Massimo CorboDepartment of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, Casa Cura Policlinico (CCP), Milan, Italy.
Valeria GinexDepartment of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, Casa Cura Policlinico (CCP), Milan, Italy.
Roberta FerrariAzienda Territoriale per i Servizi alla Persona, Vallecamonica, Breno, Italy.
Andrea LascioliAzienda Territoriale per i Servizi alla Persona, Vallecamonica, Breno, Italy.
Carolina FeritiAzienda Territoriale per i Servizi alla Persona, Vallecamonica, Breno, Italy.
Cristina MasellaDepartment of Management Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Azienda di Servizi alla Persona di Pavia (Italy) · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITPolitecnico di Milano · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFamily caregivers are key actors in the ageing society. They are mediators between practitioners and patients and usually provide also essential daily services for the elders. However, till now, few services have been deployed to help caregivers in their care tasks as in improving their mental health which can experience sever burden due to caregiving duties. The purpose of the study is to implement a community-based participatory research project to co-design an innovative organizational model of social services for family caregivers of elderly health consumers living in remote rural areas in Italy.

methodsThis is a community-based participatory research project in the remote area of Vallecamonica involving four main phases. These included a quantitative analysis of caregiver needs, a scoping review on existing services for caregivers, co-design workshops with local stakeholders and caregivers to create a novel service the piloting and a first implementation of the service and the assessment of project transferability to other contexts.

resultsAs the hours dedicated to elder care increases, both objective and developmental caregiver's burden significantly increases. Conversely, higher levels of engagement were associated with lower physical and emotional burden, and caregiver engagement was positively correlated with their perceived self-efficacy in managing disruptive patient behaviours. Based on these preliminary results, four co-design workshops with caregivers were conducted and led to the definition of the SOS caregivers service, built on four pillars structured upon the previous need analysis: a citizens' management board, training courses, peer-to-peer meetings, and project and service information. We found that co-design is an effective means of creating new services for family caregivers, whose experiential knowledge proved to be a key resource for the project team in delivering and managing services. Less positively, the transferability analysis indicated that local municipalities remain reluctant to acknowledge caregivers' pivotal role.

conclusionsA dedicated support service for caregivers can ameliorate caregiving conditions and engagement levels. The service has resulted a successful co-productive initiative for a psycho-social intervention for family caregivers. For the future, we suggest that family caregiver should be considered an active partner in the process of designing novel psycho-social services and not just as recipients to enhance a better aging-in-place process.

Indexed as

CaregiversRural PopulationAgedHumansIndependent LivingItalySocial WorkActive healthy ageingCaregiver burdenCaregiversCo-designCo-productionHard to reach populationsParticipatory action researchPatient engagementRural setting

Identifiers

PMID34154592
PMCPMC8214979
OpenAlexW3129744773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.