Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34154523›Full record

ArticleEuropean review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity2021

Saving lives through life-threatening measures? The COVID-19 paradox of infection prevention in long-term care facilities.

Ansgar Thiel, Dorothee Altmeier, Annika Frahsa, Gerhard W Eschweiler, Andreas Nieß, Gorden Sudeck, BaSAlt study team

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Patterns of physical activity among nursing home residents before and during the Covid 19 pandemic-a systematic observation.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2023
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ansgar ThielInstitute of Sport Science, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. ansgar.thiel@uni-tuebingen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9217-0442
Dorothee AltmeierInstitute of Sport Science, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Annika FrahsaInstitute of Sport Science, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Gerhard W EschweilerCentre for Geriatric Medicine, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Andreas NießInterfaculty Research Institute for Sport and Physical Activity, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Gorden SudeckInstitute of Sport Science, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
BaSAlt study team

Funding

Bundesministerium für Gesundheit Kassenzeichen 8519 0077 5013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current SARS Cov-2 infection control measures have paradoxical effects. On the one hand, the lockdown measures help to protect vulnerable populations in particular. On the other hand, these measures inevitably have the effect that those who are to be protected not only become socially isolated and are exposed to enormous psychological stress, but also break down physically due to inactivity. Thus, the activation that is omitted in the lockdown is not compensated by external reference groups, which also indicates that important conditions for healthy ageing are not given in long-term care facilities.

Indexed as

COVID-19Infection preventionLong-term careNursing homesPhysical inactivity

Identifiers

PMID34154523
PMCPMC8215307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.