Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34153932›Full record

ArticleNuclear medicine and biology

Validation of the plasmid study to relate DNA damaging effects of radionuclides to those from external beam radiotherapy.

Elise Verger, Jordan Cheng, Vittorio de Santis, Madeleine Iafrate, Jessica A Jackson, Cinzia Imberti, Gilbert O Fruhwirth, Philip J Blower, Michelle T Ma, Daniel R Burnham and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nuclear medicine and biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Elise VergerSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom.
Jordan ChengSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom.
Vittorio de SantisSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom.
Madeleine IafrateSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom.
Jessica A JacksonSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom.
Cinzia ImbertiSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom.
Gilbert O FruhwirthSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom; Comprehensive Cancer Centre, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, Guy's Hospital Campus, London SE1 1UL, United Kingdom.
Philip J BlowerSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom.
Michelle T MaSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom.
Daniel R BurnhamSingle Molecule Imaging of Genome Duplication and Maintenance Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Samantha Y A TerrySchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom. Electronic address: samantha.terry@kcl.ac.uk.
St Thomas' Hospital · GBKing's College London · GBGuy's Hospital · GBThe Francis Crick Institute · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UKMedical Research Council MR/N013700/1Wellcome Trust 203148/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe biological consequences of absorbed radiation doses are ill-defined for radiopharmaceuticals, unlike for external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). A reliable assay that assesses the biological consequences of any radionuclide is much needed. Here, we evaluated the cell-free plasmid DNA assay to determine the relative biological effects of radionuclides such as Auger electron-emitting [

methodsSupercoiled pBR322 plasmid DNA (1.25 or 5 ng/μL) was incubated with 0.5 or 1 MBq [

resultsDNA damage increased both with EBRT dose and incubation time for [

conclusionsThis work has highlighted the power of the plasmid DNA assay for a rapid determination of the relative biological effects of radionuclides compared to external beam radiotherapy. It is envisaged this approach will enable the systematic assessment of imaging and therapeutic radionuclides, including Auger electron-emitters, to further inform radiopharmaceutical design and application.

Indexed as

DNA DamagePlasmidsRadioisotopesRadiotherapyRadioisotopesAuger electronsBiological effectsExternal beam radiationRadiobiologyRadionuclides

Identifiers

PMID34153932
PMCPMC7611685
OpenAlexW3170002504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.