Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34153727›Full record

ArticleJournal of infection and public health2021

Efficacy of tocilizumab in patients with severe COVID-19: Survival and clinical outcomes.

Abeer Al-Baadani, Nazik Eltayeb, Eid Alsufyani, Salma Albahrani, Shareefah Basheri, Hawra Albayat, Enas Batubara, Sulafa Ballool, Ayed Al Assiri, Fahad Faqihi and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of infection and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cancer Occurrence as the Upcoming Complications of COVID-19.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Abeer Al-BaadaniInfectious Diseases Unit, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Nazik EltayebInfectious Diseases Unit, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Eid AlsufyaniInfectious Diseases Unit, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Salma AlbahraniInfectious Diseases Unit, Dhahran General Hospital, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
Shareefah BasheriPulmonary Medicine Unit, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Hawra AlbayatInfectious Disease Unit, Imam Abdulrahman Al Faisal Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Enas BatubaraPulmonary Medicine Unit, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sulafa BalloolInfectious Disease Unit, Imam Abdulrahman Al Faisal Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ayed Al AssiriInfectious Disease Unit, Imam Abdulrahman Al Faisal Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Fahad FaqihiInfectious Disease Unit, Imam Abdulrahman Al Faisal Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ali B MusaKing Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Asirvatham A RobertDepartment of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Saudi Arabia.
Nisreen AlsherbeeniInfectious Diseases Unit, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Fatehi ElzeinInfectious Diseases Unit, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Electronic address: felzein@psmmc.med.sa.
Riyadh Armed Forces Hospital · SAImam Abdulrahman Al Faisal Hospital · SADhahran Health Center · SAKing Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSARS-CoV-2 is associated with a severe inflammatory response contributing to respiratory and systemic manifestations, morbidity, and mortality in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

methodsTocilizumab (TCZ) efficacy on mortality and length of hospital stay was retrospectively evaluated in patients who received TCZ and compared with that in controls with a similar severity of COVID-19. The primary endpoint was survival probability on day 28. The secondary endpoints included survival at day 14 and length of hospital stay.

resultsOf the 148 patients included in the study, 62 received TCZ and standard of care, whereas 86 served as a control group and received only standard of care. The two groups were similar, although TCZ-treated patients were more likely to exhibit hypertension (46.7% vs. 29.8%), chronic kidney disease (14.5% vs. 1.1%), and high Charlson score (1.18 vs. 1.00; p = 0.006) and less likely to receive corticosteroid treatment (48.5% vs. 93.0%). TCZ was associated with lower mortality on both day 28 (16.1% vs. 37.2%, p = 0.004) and day 14 (9.7% vs. 24.4%, p = 0.022). The hospital stay was longer in the TCZ-treated than in the control group (15.6 ± 7.59 vs.17.7 ± 7.8 days, p = 0.103). Ten patients (16.0%) in the TCZ-treated group developed infections.

conclusionTCZ was associated with a lower likelihood of death despite resulting in higher infection rates and a non-significant longer hospital stay.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedHumansRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Treatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedtocilizumabCOVID-19Hospital stayInterleukin-6SARS-CoV2SurvivalTocilizumab

Identifiers

PMID34153727
PMCPMC8166045
OpenAlexW3170420514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.