Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34153462›Full record

Observational studyJournal of pain and symptom management2021

Does it Matter Who Decides? Outcomes of Surrogate Decision-Making for Community-Dwelling, Cognitively Impaired Older Adults Near the End of Life.

Micah Y Baum, Joseph J Gallo, Marie T Nolan, Kenneth M Langa, Scott D Halpern, Mario Macis, Lauren Hersch Nicholas

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of pain and symptom management, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Micah Y BaumJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Joseph J GalloJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Marie T NolanJohns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland.
Kenneth M LangaUniversity of Michigan Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan; University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Scott D HalpernUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Mario MacisJohns Hopkins Carey Business School, Baltimore, Maryland; Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Lauren Hersch NicholasJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland; University of Michigan Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, Colorado. Electronic address: lauren.h.nicholas@cuanschutz.edu.
Johns Hopkins University · USColorado School of Public Health · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USWilliam Carey University · US

Funding

HRS Yrs29-34: Y33 SSA CoFundingU01AG009740 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Jessica Faul, KENNETH M LANGA · 1990 to 2026
$555.8M
Research Education CoreP30AG024824 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Neil Alexander · 2004 to 2026
$29.2M
Remote Data Enclave Core (RDEC)P30AG066587 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DANIEL E POLSKY, Jennifer L. Wolff · 2020 to 2026
$6.7M
Understanding and Respecting End-of-Life Treatment Preferences Among Older Adults with Alzheimer's Disease and Related DementiasR01AG059205 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI NICHOLAS, LAUREN HERSCH · 2018 to 2022
$2.6M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024824NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066587NIA NIH HHS R01 AG059205NIA NIH HHS U01 AG009740
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextCognitively impaired older adults frequently need surrogate decision-making near the end-of-life. It is unknown whether differences in the surrogate's relationship to the decedent are associated with different end-of-life treatment choices.

objectivesTo describe differences in end-of-life care for community dwelling, cognitively impaired older adults when children and spouses are involved in decision-making.

methodsRetrospective observational study.

resultsAmong 742 community-dwelling adults with cognitive impairment (mild cognitive impairment or dementia) prior to death, children participated in end-of-life decisions for 615 patients (83%) and spouses participated in decisions for 258 patients (35%), with both children and spouses participating for 131 patients (18%). When controlling for demographic characteristics, decedents with only a spouse decision-maker were less likely to undergo a life-sustaining treatment than decedents with only children decision-makers (P < 0.05). There was no difference in the probability of in-hospital death or burdensome transfers across facilities across decedent-decision-maker relationships. Differences in rates of life-sustaining treatment were greater when we restricted to decedents with dementia.

conclusionDecedents with cognitive impairment or dementia were less likely to receive life-sustaining treatments when spouses versus children were involved with end-of-life treatment decisions but were no less likely to experience other measures of potentially burdensome end-of-life care.

Indexed as

Independent LivingTerminal CareAgedChildDeathDecision MakingHospital MortalityHumansend-of-life decisionsfamilySurrogate decision-making

Identifiers

PMID34153462
PMCPMC8648882
OpenAlexW3177406655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.