ArticleThe Journal of investigative dermatology2021
Increased Risk of Skin Cancer in 1,851 Long-Term Retinoblastoma Survivors.
Article in The Journal of investigative dermatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk of subsequent primary melanoma in 68 002 five-year survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer in Europe: the PanCareSurFup cohort study.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2026Article
- Non-Ocular Cancers in Parents of Patients Diagnosed with Retinoblastoma in Britain 1949 to 1987.Cancers · 2026Article
- Metastatic Melanoma in a Retinoblastoma Survivor: Can Immunohistochemistry Save the Day?Cureus · 2025Article
- The Association Between Anion Gap and Albumin-Corrected Anion Gap with Sun Sensitivity: A National Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2025Article
- Multiomics Profiling Distinguishes Sebaceous Carcinoma from Benign Sebaceous Neoplasms and Provides Insight into the Genetic Evolution of Sebaceous Carcinogenesis.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024Article
- Distinct patterns of proteostasis network gene expression are associated with different prognoses in melanoma patients.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with hereditary retinoblastoma are at risk for developing cutaneous melanoma, but little is known about the role of sun exposure or other factors, and the incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is poorly understood. We investigated the incidence of melanoma and NMSC in a cohort of 1,851 White, long-term retinoblastoma survivors (1,020 hereditary and 831 nonhereditary) diagnosed during 1914‒2006. During follow-up through 2016, 33 hereditary and 7 nonhereditary survivors developed melanoma, and 26 hereditary and 9 nonhereditary survivors developed NMSC. Most NMSCs were on the head/neck, whereas melanomas were more broadly distributed with patterns similar to melanoma-prone families. For both outcomes, the median age at diagnosis was ~20 years younger among hereditary survivors than among nonhereditary survivors. At 50 years after retinoblastoma diagnosis, the cumulative incidence in hereditary survivors was 4.5% for melanoma and 3.7% for NMSC; for nonhereditary survivors, it was 0.7% and 1.5%, respectively. Sun sensitivity and phenotypic characteristics generally did not vary by skin cancer status. Hereditary retinoblastoma survivors have an increased risk for melanoma and NMSC that occurred earlier than that observed among nonhereditary survivors, likely reflecting genetic factors. These findings among White retinoblastoma survivors support consensus-based recommendations for skin cancer screening and sun protection starting at young ages and continuing long term.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.