ArticlePloS one2021
Deep learning for classification of pediatric chest radiographs by WHO's standardized methodology.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pediatric chest radiograph interpretation: how far has artificial intelligence come? A systematic literature review.Pediatric radiology · 2022Pooled it
- Performance of adult-trained artificial intelligence models in paediatric imaging-a scoping review.European radiology · 2026Article
- Bridging the gap: the need for pediatric-specific AI models for tuberculosis detection on chest radiographs.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- CurriMAE: curriculum learning based masked autoencoders for multi-labeled pediatric thoracic disease classification.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- Optimising computer aided detection to identify intra-thoracic tuberculosis on chest x-ray in South African children.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
- A machine learning approach to explore individual risk factors for tuberculosis treatment non-adherence in Mukono district.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
- Artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support in pediatrics.Pediatric research · 2023Review
- The development of a novel natural language processing tool to identify pediatric chest radiograph reports with pneumonia.Frontiers in digital health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe World Health Organization (WHO)-defined radiological pneumonia is a preferred endpoint in pneumococcal vaccine efficacy and effectiveness studies in children. Automating the WHO methodology may support more widespread application of this endpoint.
methodsWe trained a deep learning model to classify pneumonia CXRs in children using the World Health Organization (WHO)'s standardized methodology. The model was pretrained on CheXpert, a dataset containing 224,316 adult CXRs, and fine-tuned on PERCH, a pediatric dataset containing 4,172 CXRs. The model was then tested on two pediatric CXR datasets released by WHO. We also compared the model's performance to that of radiologists and pediatricians.
resultsThe average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for primary endpoint pneumonia (PEP) across 10-fold validation of PERCH images was 0.928; average AUC after testing on WHO images was 0.977. The model's classification performance was better on test images with high inter-observer agreement; however, the model still outperformed human assessments in AUC and precision-recall spaces on low agreement images.
conclusionA deep learning model can classify pneumonia CXR images in children at a performance comparable to human readers. Our method lays a strong foundation for the potential inclusion of computer-aided readings of pediatric CXRs in vaccine trials and epidemiology studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.