Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34153067›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Year-round at-sea distribution and trophic resources partitioning between two sympatric Sulids in the tropical Atlantic.

Nathalie Almeida, Jaime A Ramos, Isabel Rodrigues, Ivo Dos Santos, Jorge M Pereira, Diana M Matos, Pedro M Araújo, Pedro Geraldes, Tommy Melo, Vitor H Paiva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nathalie AlmeidaDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, MARE-Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Calçada Martim de Freitas, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-1302-3944
Jaime A RamosDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, MARE-Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Calçada Martim de Freitas, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-9533-987X
Isabel RodriguesBiosfera Cabo Verde, São Vicente, Cabo Verde.
Ivo Dos SantosDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, MARE-Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Calçada Martim de Freitas, Coimbra, Portugal.
Jorge M PereiraDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, MARE-Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Calçada Martim de Freitas, Coimbra, Portugal.
Diana M MatosDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, MARE-Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Calçada Martim de Freitas, Coimbra, Portugal.
Pedro M AraújoDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, MARE-Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Calçada Martim de Freitas, Coimbra, Portugal.
Pedro GeraldesSPEA-Sociedade Portuguesa para o Estudo das Aves, Lisboa, Portugal.
Tommy MeloBiosfera Cabo Verde, São Vicente, Cabo Verde.
Vitor H PaivaDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, MARE-Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Calçada Martim de Freitas, Coimbra, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the oligotrophic tropical marine environment resources are usually more patchily distributed and less abundant to top predators. Thus, spatial and trophic competition can emerge, especially between related seabird species belonging to the same ecological guild. Here we studied the foraging ecology of two sympatric species-brown booby (BRBO) Sula leucogaster (breeding) and red-footed boobies (RFBO) Sula sula (non-breeding)-at Raso islet (Cabo Verde), across different seasons. Sexual segregation was only observed during Jun-Oct, when RFBO were present, with larger females BRBO remaining closer to the colonies, while males and RFBO travelled further and exploited different habitats. Overall, species appeared to prefer areas with specific oceanic features, particularly those related with oceanic currents and responsible for enhancing primary productivity in tropical oceanic areas (e.g. Sea Surface Height and Ocean Mixed Layer Thickness). Female BRBOs showed high foraging-site fidelity during the period of sympatry, while exploiting the same prey species as the other birds. However, during the months of co-existence (Jun.-Oct.), isotopic mixing models suggested that female BRBO would consume a higher proportion of epipelagic fish, whereas female RFBO would consume more squid compared to the other birds, possibly due to habitat-specific prey availability and breeding energy-constraints for BRBO. We conclude that divergent parental roles, environmental conditions, habitat preference and competition could be mechanisms simultaneously underlying sexual segregation for BRBO during a period of co-existence, while inter-specific foraging differences appear to be more affected by habitat preference and different breeding stages. These results support previous statements that BRBO can adapt their foraging ecology to different circumstances of environmental conditions and competition, and that marine physical features play an important role in foraging decisions of boobies.

Indexed as

EcosystemFeeding BehaviorSeasonsSympatryAnimal DistributionAnimalsBirdsFemaleMaleNutritional StatusOceans and Seas

Identifiers

PMID34153067
PMCPMC8216530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.