Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34153054›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Conservation aquaculture as a tool for imperiled marine species: Evaluation of opportunities and risks for Olympia oysters, Ostrea lurida.

April D Ridlon, Kerstin Wasson, Tiffany Waters, John Adams, Jamie Donatuto, Gary Fleener, Halley Froehlich, Rhona Govender, Aaron Kornbluth, Julio Lorda and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

April D RidlonScience for Nature and People Partnership and National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4618-9908
Kerstin WassonElkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Watsonvile, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1858-4505
Tiffany WatersGlobal Aquaculture, The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, Virginia, United States of America.
John AdamsSound Fresh Clams and Oysters, Shelton, Washington, United States of America.
Jamie DonatutoCommunity Environmental Health Program, Swinomish Indian Tribal Community, LaConner, Washington, United States of America.
Gary FleenerResearch and Development, Hog Island Oyster Co., Marshall, California, United States of America.
Halley FroehlichEcology, Evolution & Marine Biology and Environmental Studies, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.
Rhona GovenderSpecies at Risk Program, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, British Columbia, Canada.
Aaron KornbluthOfficer, The Pew Charitable Trusts, Washington D.C., United States of America.
Julio LordaFacultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Mexicali, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-4293-7518
Betsy PeabodyPuget Sound Restoration Fund, Bainbridge Island, Washington, United States of America.
Gifford Pinchot IvChelsea Farms, Olympia, Washington, United States of America.
Steven S RumrillMarine Resources Program, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Newport, Oregon, United States of America.
Elizabeth TobinNatural Resources Department, Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe, Sequim, Washington, United States of America.
Chela J ZabinMarine Invasions Research, Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Belvedere Tiburon, California, United States of America.
Danielle ZacherlDepartment of Biological Science, California State University Fullerton, Fullerton, California, United States of America.
Edwin D GrosholzDepartment of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California-Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conservation aquaculture is becoming an important tool to support the recovery of declining marine species and meet human needs. However, this tool comes with risks as well as rewards, which must be assessed to guide aquaculture activities and recovery efforts. Olympia oysters (Ostrea lurida) provide key ecosystem functions and services along the west coast of North America, but populations have declined to the point of local extinction in some estuaries. Here, we present a species-level, range-wide approach to strategically planning the use of aquaculture to promote recovery of Olympia oysters. We identified 12 benefits of culturing Olympia oysters, including identifying climate-resilient phenotypes that add diversity to growers' portfolios. We also identified 11 key risks, including potential negative ecological and genetic consequences associated with the transfer of hatchery-raised oysters into wild populations. Informed by these trade-offs, we identified ten priority estuaries where aquaculture is most likely to benefit Olympia oyster recovery. The two highest scoring estuaries have isolated populations with extreme recruitment limitation-issues that can be addressed via aquaculture if hatchery capacity is expanded in priority areas. By integrating social criteria, we evaluated which project types would likely meet the goals of local stakeholders in each estuary. Community restoration was most broadly suited to the priority areas, with limited commercial aquaculture and no current community harvest of the species, although this is a future stakeholder goal. The framework we developed to evaluate aquaculture as a tool to support species recovery is transferable to other systems and species globally; we provide a guide to prioritizing local knowledge and developing recommendations for implementation by using transparent criteria. Our collaborative process engaging diverse stakeholders including managers, scientists, Indigenous Tribal representatives, and shellfish growers can be used elsewhere to seek win-win opportunities to expand conservation aquaculture where benefits are maximized for both people and imperiled species.

Indexed as

EcosystemEndangered SpeciesAnimalsAquacultureBritish ColumbiaCaliforniaConservation of Natural ResourcesEstuariesGeographyHumansMexicoOregonOstreaReproducibility of ResultsRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID34153054
PMCPMC8216563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.