Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34152830›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2021

Strategic Variants of CSP Delivered as SynDNA Vaccines Demonstrate Heterogeneity of Immunogenicity and Protection from

Sophia M Reeder, Mamadou A Bah, Nicholas J Tursi, Rebekah C Brooks, Ami Patel, Rianne Esquivel, Alison Eaton, Hugo Jhun, Jacqueline Chu, Kevin Kim and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sophia M ReederThe Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvaniagrid.25879.31, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4027-4252
Mamadou A BahThe Vaccine Center, Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Nicholas J TursiThe Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvaniagrid.25879.31, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Rebekah C BrooksThe Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvaniagrid.25879.31, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Ami PatelThe Vaccine Center, Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2104-9984
Rianne EsquivelThe Vaccine Center, Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Alison EatonDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Malaria Research Institute, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Hugo JhunDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Malaria Research Institute, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Jacqueline ChuThe Vaccine Center, Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Kevin KimThe Vaccine Center, Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Ziyang XuThe Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvaniagrid.25879.31, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Fidel ZavalaDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Malaria Research Institute, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
David B WeinerThe Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvaniagrid.25879.31, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2232-8512

Funding

Training In Tumor VirologyT32CA115299 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ROBERTSON, ERLE S. · 2006 to 2021
$4.7M
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) 6789101374HHS | NIH | National Cancer Institute (NCI) 2-T32-CA-115299-11NCI NIH HHS T32 CA115299
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malaria infects millions of people every year, and despite recent advances in controlling disease spread, such as vaccination, it remains a global health concern. The circumsporozoite protein (CSP) has long been acknowledged as a key target in antimalarial immunity. Leveraging the DNA vaccine platform against this formidable pathogen, the following five synthetic DNA vaccines encoding variations of CSP were designed and studied: 3D7, GPI1, ΔGPI, TM, and DD2. Among the single CSP antigen constructs, a range of immunogenicity was observed with ΔGPI generating the most robust immunity. In an intravenous (i.v.) sporozoite challenge, the best protection among vaccinated mice was achieved by ΔGPI, which performed almost as well as the monoclonal antibody 311 (MAb 311) antibody control. Further analyses revealed that ΔGPI develops high-molecular-weight multimers in addition to monomeric CSP. We then compared the immunity generated by ΔGPI versus synDNA mimics for the antimalaria vaccines RTS,S and R21. The anti-CSP antibody responses induced were similar among these three immunogens. T cell responses demonstrated that ΔGPI induced a more focused anti-CSP response. In an infectious mosquito challenge, all three of these constructs generated inhibition of liver-stage infection as well as immunity from blood-stage parasitemia. This study demonstrates that synDNA mimics of complex malaria immunogens can provide substantial protection as can a novel synDNA vaccine ΔGPI.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, ProtozoanCell LineDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineMalariaMalaria, FalciparumMalaria VaccinesMiceMice, Inbred BALB CPlasmodium bergheiPlasmodium falciparumProtozoan ProteinsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Protozoancircumsporozoite protein, ProtozoanMalaria VaccinesProtozoan ProteinsVaccines, SyntheticDNA vaccinesimmunizationmalaria

Identifiers

PMID34152830
PMCPMC8445182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.