Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34152808›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2021

Implementation of Pharmacist-Driven Antifungal Stewardship Program in a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Emre Kara, Gokhan Metan, Aygin Bayraktar-Ekincioglu, Dolunay Gulmez, Sevtap Arikan-Akdagli, Figen Demirkazik, Murat Akova, Serhat Unal, Omrum Uzun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Consensus paper onTurkish journal of medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. The Effect of the Pandemic on Antifungal Use: What Has Changed?Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Emre KaraHacettepe University Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Ankara, Turkey.
Gokhan MetanHacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Ankara, Turkey.
Aygin Bayraktar-EkinciogluHacettepe University Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Ankara, Turkey.
Dolunay GulmezHacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Microbiology, Ankara, Turkey.
Sevtap Arikan-AkdagliHacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Microbiology, Ankara, Turkey.
Figen DemirkazikHacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Ankara, Turkey.
Murat AkovaHacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Ankara, Turkey.
Serhat UnalHacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Ankara, Turkey.
Omrum UzunHacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Ankara, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antifungal stewardship (AFS) is recommended to reduce the inappropriate use of antifungal drugs. In this study, the role of AFS in providing appropriate antifungal therapy was evaluated. This study included three periods, consisting of observation, feedback/education, and daily AFS activities. In the observation period, the use of systemic antifungals was evaluated for a baseline measurement of appropriateness. In the second period, monthly meetings were organized to provide feedback and education to physicians regarding antifungal therapy and the rate of adherence to the clinical guidelines. In the final period, a clinical pharmacist participated in daily ward rounds to evaluate the appropriateness of the antifungal therapy. A scoring system for appropriateness was used for comparison between the three periods. Four hundred eighteen episodes of antifungal therapy were evaluated. Baseline demographics of patients were similar in all three periods for age, gender, and the number of comorbidities. The indications for antifungal use were for prophylaxis in 22.7%,

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsMycosesHumansPharmacistsTertiary Care CentersAntifungal Agentsantifungal agentsantifungal therapypharmacology

Identifiers

PMID34152808
PMCPMC8370214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.