Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34152784›Full record

Trial reportHealth psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association2021

Effects of culturally targeted message framing on colorectal cancer screening among African Americans.

Todd Lucas, Hayley S Thompson, James Blessman, Anurag Dawadi, Caroline E Drolet, Kelly A Hirko, Louis A Penner

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Todd LucasDivision of Public Health.
Hayley S ThompsonDepartment of Community Outreach and Engagement.
James BlessmanDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health Sciences.
Anurag DawadiDivision of Public Health.
Caroline E DroletDivision of Public Health.
Kelly A HirkoDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics.ORCID 0000-0002-0050-655X
Louis A PennerDepartment of Oncology.ORCID 0000-0002-0455-7696

Funding

Culturally Targeted Loss Framed Messaging for Colorectal Cancer Screening in African AmericansR01CA175088 · NCI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LUCAS, TODD WILLIAM · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA175088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study examined how standard and culturally targeted versions of gain and loss-framed messaging affect African Americans' colorectal cancer (CRC) screening receptivity and behavior, as well as their anticipation of experiencing racism in undertaking CRC screening.

methodScreening-deficient African Americans (N = 457) viewed an informational video about CRC risks, prevention, and screening and were randomized to receive a gain or loss-framed message about screening. Half of participants viewed an additional culturally targeted message about overcoming racial disparities in CRC by obtaining screening. Using the Theory of Planned Behavior, we measured general receptivity to CRC screening. We also measured arousal of anticipatory racism in response to messaging. Finally, we offered participants a no-cost fecal immunochemical testing kit (FIT Kit) and measured uptake and use.

resultsMessage framing interacted with culturally targeted messaging to affect CRC screening receptivity and behavior. Participants were no more receptive to CRC screening when standard loss-framing was used, but were more favorable if loss-framing was culturally targeted. Targeted loss-framing also reduced anticipatory racism, which partially mediated effects on screening receptivity. Finally, although participants least often accepted a FIT Kit with standard loss-framing, effects of messaging on FIT Kit uptake and use were not significant.

conclusionThis study adds to growing recognition of important cultural nuance in effective use of message framing. Current finding also suggest that targeted and framed messaging could synergistically impact the extent to which African Americans engage in CRC screening, although specific impacts on FIT Kit screening are less certain. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Cultural CompetencyAgedBlack or African AmericanColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealth CommunicationHumansMaleMiddle AgedOccult BloodRacism

Identifiers

PMID34152784
PMCPMC8330134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.