Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34152759›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2021

A Case Study in Catalyst Generality: Simultaneous, Highly-Enantioselective Brønsted- and Lewis-Acid Mechanisms in Hydrogen-Bond-Donor Catalyzed Oxetane Openings.

Daniel A Strassfeld, Russell F Algera, Zachary K Wickens, Eric N Jacobsen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Privileged Chiral Photocatalysts.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel A StrassfeldDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, United States.
Russell F AlgeraDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, United States.
Zachary K WickensDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5733-5288
Eric N JacobsenDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7952-3661
Harvard University · US

Funding

CHIRAL COMPLEXES DESIGNED TO CATALYZE ORGANIC REACTIONSR01GM043214 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI JACOBSEN, ERIC N · 1991 to 2023
$9.4M
Chiral Catalysts Designed to Catalyze Organic ReactionsR37GM043214 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI JACOBSEN, ERIC N · 2002 to 2011
$6.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM043214NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM043214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generality in asymmetric catalysis can be manifested in dramatic and valuable ways, such as high enantioselectivity across a wide assortment of substrates in a given reaction (broad substrate scope) or as applicability of a given chiral framework across a variety of mechanistically distinct reactions (privileged catalysts). Reactions and catalysts that display such generality hold special utility, because they can be applied broadly and sometimes even predictably in new applications. Despite the great value of such systems, the factors that underlie generality are not well understood. Here, we report a detailed investigation of an asymmetric hydrogen-bond-donor catalyzed oxetane opening with TMSBr that is shown to possess unexpected mechanistic generality. Careful analysis of the role of adventitious protic impurities revealed the participation of competing pathways involving addition of either TMSBr or HBr in the enantiodetermining, ring-opening event. The optimal catalyst induces high enantioselectivity in both pathways, thereby achieving precise stereocontrol in fundamentally different mechanisms under the same conditions and with the same chiral framework. The basis for that generality is analyzed using a combination of experimental and computational methods, which indicate that proximally localized catalyst components cooperatively stabilize and precisely orient dipolar enantiodetermining transition states in both pathways. Generality across different mechanisms is rarely considered in catalyst discovery efforts, but we suggest that it may play a role in the identification of so-called privileged catalysts.

Indexed as

CatalysisEthers, CyclicHydrocarbons, BrominatedHydrogen BondingLewis AcidsModels, ChemicalStereoisomerismTrimethylsilyl CompoundsEthers, CyclicHydrocarbons, BrominatedLewis Acidsoxetanetrimethylsilyl bromideTrimethylsilyl Compounds

Identifiers

PMID34152759
PMCPMC8564877
OpenAlexW3177416533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.