ArticleClinical and investigative medicine. Medecine clinique et experimentale2021
Validation of Diagnosis and Procedure Codes for Revascularization for Peripheral Artery Disease in Ontario Administrative Databases.
Article in Clinical and investigative medicine. Medecine clinique et experimentale, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- PCSK9 Inhibitors and Risk of Aortic Stenosis in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Underuse of Preoperative Testing Before Index Peripheral Vascular Interventions for Claudication in the Outpatient Setting.Annals of vascular surgery · 2026Article
- Cardiovascular Disease in Males With Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Cohort Study.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Extending the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model to Support Observational Peripheral Vascular Disease Research.The Journal of surgical research · 2026Observational
- Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Polyvascular Disease.Cardiology and therapy · 2025Article
- Validation ofCirculation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2025Article
- Editor's Choice - Infrapopliteal Peripheral Vascular Interventions for Claudication are Performed Frequently in the USA and Are Associated with Poor Long Term Outcomes.European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery · 2025Article
- Article
- Statin Use and Stroke Rate in Older Adults With Atrial Fibrillation: A Population-Based Cohort Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- Accuracy of Administrative Claims Codes for Identifying Devices Used in Endovascular Femoropopliteal Artery Revascularisation: A Retrospective Observational Study at Two Tertiary Centres in the United States.European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo estimate the positive predictive value of diagnosis and procedure codes for open and endovascular revascularization for peripheral artery disease (PAD) in Ontario administrative databases.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective validation study using population-based Ontario administrative databases (2005-2019) to identify a random sample of 600 patients who underwent revascularization for PAD at two academic centres, based on ICD-10 diagnosis codes and Canada Classification of Health Intervention procedure codes. Administrative data coding was compared to the gold standard diagnosis (PAD vs. non-PAD) and revascularization approach (open vs. endovascular) extracted through blinded hospital chart re-abstraction. Positive predictive values and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Combinations of procedure codes with or without supplemental physician claims codes were evaluated to optimize the positive predictive value.
resultsThe overall positive predictive value of PAD diagnosis codes was 87.5% (84.6%-90.0%). The overall positive predictive value of revascularization procedure codes was 94.3% (92.2%-96.0%), which improved through supplementation with physician fee claim codes to 98.1% (96.6%-99.0%). Algorithms to identify individuals revascularized for PAD had combined positive predictive values ranging from 82.8% (79.6%-85.8%) to 95.7% (93.5%-97.3%).
conclusionDiagnosis and procedure codes with or without physician claims codes allow for accurate identifi-cation of individuals revascularized for PAD in Ontario administrative databases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34152705What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.