Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34152673›Full record

ArticleANZ journal of surgery2021

Patient perceptions of surgical telehealth consultations during the COVID 19 pandemic in Australia: Lessons for future implementation.

Elvina Wiadji, Lisa Mackenzie, Patrick Reeder, Jonathan S Gani, Sima Ahmadi, Rosemary Carroll, Stephen Smith, Mark Frydenberg, Christine J O'Neill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ANZ journal of surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Patient Satisfaction with Telemedicine during the COVID-19 Pandemic-A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Telehealth in a paediatric developmental metropolitan assessment clinic: Perspectives and experiences of families and clinicians.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elvina WiadjiSurgical Services, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Lisa MackenzieUniversity of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Patrick ReederRoyal Australasian College of Surgeons, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jonathan S GaniSurgical Services, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Sima AhmadiHunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Rosemary CarrollSurgical Services, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Stephen SmithSurgical Services, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Mark FrydenbergRoyal Australasian College of Surgeons, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Christine J O'NeillSurgical Services, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3122-8660

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPrior studies of telehealth report high levels of patient satisfaction, but within carefully selected clinical scenarios. The COVID-19 pandemic led to telehealth replacing face-to-face care for many surgical consultations across a variety of situations. More evidence is needed regarding patient perceptions of telehealth in surgery, in particular, exploring barriers and facilitators associated with its sustained implementation beyond the pandemic.

methodsSurvey invitations were emailed to a convenience sample of surgical patients by their surgeon following a telehealth consultation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Surgeons were recruited from a sample (n = 683) who completed a survey on telehealth (distributed via email to all Australian Fellows of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons). Mixed methods analysis was performed of the patient survey data.

resultsA total of 1166 consultations were captured: 50% routine reviews, 17% initial appointments and 20% post-operative reviews. Video-link was used in 49% of consultations. The majority of patients (94%), were satisfied with the quality of their surgical telehealth consultation and 75% felt it delivered the same level of care as face-to-face encounters. Telehealth was convenient to use (96%) and led to cost savings for 60% of patients. When asked about future appointment preferences after the pandemic, 41% indicated they would prefer telehealth (24% video-link and 17% telephone) over face-to-face appointments. There was a perception by patients that telehealth consultation fees should be less than face-to-face consultation fees.

conclusionPatient satisfaction with surgical telehealth consultations is high. Barriers to more widespread implementation include financial, clinical appropriateness, technical and confidentiality concerns.

Indexed as

COVID-19TelemedicineAustraliaHumansPandemicsPerceptionReferral and ConsultationSARS-CoV-2surgerytelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID34152673
PMCPMC8420414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.