Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34152628›Full record

SynthesisJournal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research2021

Systematic review of major osteoporotic fracture to hip fracture incidence rate ratios worldwide: implications for Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX)-derived estimates.

Marlene Chakhtoura, Hiba Dagher, Sima Sharara, Sara Ajjour, Nariman Chamoun, Jane Cauley, Ziyad Mahfoud, Robert Boudreau, Ghada El Hajj Fuleihan

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Systematic review of major osteoporotic fracture to hip fracture incidence rate ratios worldwide: implications for Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX)-derived estimates.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Global burden of hip fracture: The Global Burden of Disease Study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Marlene ChakhtouraCalcium Metabolism & Osteoporosis Program, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID 0000-0003-0012-986X
Hiba DagherCalcium Metabolism & Osteoporosis Program, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Sima ShararaCalcium Metabolism & Osteoporosis Program, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Sara AjjourCalcium Metabolism & Osteoporosis Program, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Nariman ChamounCalcium Metabolism & Osteoporosis Program, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Jane CauleyDepartment of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0752-4408
Ziyad MahfoudWeill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Doha, Qatar.
Robert BoudreauDepartment of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Ghada El Hajj FuleihanCalcium Metabolism & Osteoporosis Program, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID 0000-0002-2076-5858
American University of Beirut Medical Center · LBUniversity of Pittsburgh · USWeill Cornell Medical College in Qatar · QA

Funding

Genetic and Metabolic Determinants of 25(OH)D levels at Baseline and One Year: Findings from a Dose Ranging Vitamin D trialD43TW009118 · FIC · AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF BEIRUT · PI FULEIHAN, GHADA ELHAJJ · 2012 to 2024
$2.5M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009118
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) is the most widely used tool for fracture prediction. It provides 10-year probabilities for hip and major osteoporotic fracture (MOF). It uses country-specific hip fracture incidence and life expectancy data, and for most countries, MOF/hip fracture incidence rate ratios (IRRs) from Malmo Sweden. However, the risk of MOF varies by age, sex, and geography. The objective is to compare the MOF/hip IRRs across countries, by sex and age. This systematic review targeted observational studies of MOF and hip fractures in individuals >50 years (PROSPERO 2019 CRD42019129259). One reviewer screened potential articles. Two reviewers completed duplicate and independent data abstraction, and assessed study quality based on population representativeness, study design and duration, definition of ethnicity, and fracture characteristics. We calculated the MOF/hip IRRs (95% confidence interval) and Z-values to compare IRRs in various countries to those for Sweden. We included 27 studies, of fair to good quality in the majority, from Europe (15), US and Canada (7), Asia (3), and Australia (2). The IRRs were twofold to 10-fold higher in younger compared to older age categories, and in women compared to men, with few exceptions. Within Europe, and using Sweden as a reference, MOF/Hip IRRs in women 50-54 years from Finland, Italy, Netherlands, Denmark, and UK were significantly lower by 38% to 60%. Findings were similar in men. At older ages, MOF/Hip IRRs were consistently lower in women from European countries compared to Sweden, by 10%-40% and 11%-51%, at 75-79 years and 85-89 years, respectively. Findings were heterogenous in men and in non-European countries. In conclusion, the MOF/hip fracture IRR may vary between countries. The variability at older ages may affect FRAX prediction when country-specific fracture IRRs are not used. Further research is needed to elucidate the implication of our findings to FRAX-derived MOF estimates in various countries. © 2021 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Indexed as

Hip FracturesOsteoporotic FracturesAgedBone DensityFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsDISEASES AND DISORDERS OF/RELATED TO BONEEPIDEMIOLOGYFRACTURE RISK ASSESSMENTGENERAL POPULATION STUDIESOSTEOPOROSISPRACTICE/POLICY-RELATED ISSUES

Identifiers

PMID34152628
PMCPMC8531513
OpenAlexW3176193062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.