ArticleActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2021
Pre-hospital emergency anaesthesia in trauma patients treated by anaesthesiologist and nurse anaesthetist staffed critical care teams.
Article in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prehospital times and outcomes for hypotensive trauma patients in Sweden.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Application of an artificial intelligence-based airway identification system in tracheal intubation.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Article
- Construction and preliminary trial test of a decision-making app for pre-hospital damage control resuscitation.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2025Article
- Prehospital emergency anesthesia: A single-center retrospective analysis of guideline adherence and unexpected incidents.PloS one · 2024Article
- Prehospital and emergency department airway management of severe penetrating trauma in Sweden during the past decade.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2023Observational
- Prehospital transportation of severe penetrating trauma victims in Sweden during the past decade: a police business?Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2023Article
- Clinical application of a body area network-based smart bracelet for pre-hospital trauma care.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Pre-hospital emergency anaesthesia in trauma patients treated by anaesthesiologist and nurse anaesthetist staffed critical care teams.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPre-hospital tracheal intubation in trauma patients has recently been questioned. However, not only the trauma and patient characteristics but also airway provider competence differ between systems making simplified statements difficult.
methodThe study is a subgroup analysis of trauma patients included in the PHAST study. PHAST was a prospective, observational, multicentre study on pre-hospital advanced airway management by anaesthesiologist and nurse anaesthetist manned pre-hospital critical care teams in the Nordic countries May 2015-November 2016. Endpoints include intubation success rate, complication rate (airway-related complication according to Utstein Airway Template by Sollid et al), scene time (time from arrival of the critical care team to departure of the patient) and pre-hospital mortality.
resultThe critical care teams intubated 385 trauma patients, of which 65 were in shock (SBP <90 mm Hg), during the study. Of the trauma patients, 93% suffered from blunt trauma, the mean GCS was 6 and 75% were intubated by an experienced provider who had performed >2500 tracheal intubations. The pre-hospital tracheal intubation overall success rate was 98.6% and the complication rate was 13.6%, with no difference between patients with or without shock. The mean scene time was significantly shorter in trauma patients with shock (21.4 min) compared to without shock (21.4 vs 25.1 min). Following pre-hospital tracheal intubation, 97% of trauma patients without shock and 91% of the patients in shock with measurable blood pressure were alive upon arrival to the ED.
conclusionPre-hospital tracheal intubation success and complication rates in trauma patients were comparable with in-hospital rates in a system with very experienced airway providers. Whether the short scene times contributed to a low pre-hospital mortality needs further investigation in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.