Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34152597›Full record

ArticleActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2021

Pre-hospital emergency anaesthesia in trauma patients treated by anaesthesiologist and nurse anaesthetist staffed critical care teams.

Bjarni Árnason, Daniel Hertzberg, Daniel Kornhall, Mattias Günther, Mikael Gellerfors

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prehospital times and outcomes for hypotensive trauma patients in Sweden.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Bjarni ÁrnasonDepartment of Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5447-4576
Daniel HertzbergDepartment of Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9012-6365
Daniel KornhallSwedish Air Ambulance (SLA), Mora, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2961-8392
Mattias GüntherDepartment of Clinical Research and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2372-6114
Mikael GellerforsDepartment of Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska University Hospital · SEAnglian Water Services (United Kingdom) · GBKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPre-hospital tracheal intubation in trauma patients has recently been questioned. However, not only the trauma and patient characteristics but also airway provider competence differ between systems making simplified statements difficult.

methodThe study is a subgroup analysis of trauma patients included in the PHAST study. PHAST was a prospective, observational, multicentre study on pre-hospital advanced airway management by anaesthesiologist and nurse anaesthetist manned pre-hospital critical care teams in the Nordic countries May 2015-November 2016. Endpoints include intubation success rate, complication rate (airway-related complication according to Utstein Airway Template by Sollid et al), scene time (time from arrival of the critical care team to departure of the patient) and pre-hospital mortality.

resultThe critical care teams intubated 385 trauma patients, of which 65 were in shock (SBP <90 mm Hg), during the study. Of the trauma patients, 93% suffered from blunt trauma, the mean GCS was 6 and 75% were intubated by an experienced provider who had performed >2500 tracheal intubations. The pre-hospital tracheal intubation overall success rate was 98.6% and the complication rate was 13.6%, with no difference between patients with or without shock. The mean scene time was significantly shorter in trauma patients with shock (21.4 min) compared to without shock (21.4 vs 25.1 min). Following pre-hospital tracheal intubation, 97% of trauma patients without shock and 91% of the patients in shock with measurable blood pressure were alive upon arrival to the ED.

conclusionPre-hospital tracheal intubation success and complication rates in trauma patients were comparable with in-hospital rates in a system with very experienced airway providers. Whether the short scene times contributed to a low pre-hospital mortality needs further investigation in future studies.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaEmergency Medical ServicesCritical CareHospitalsHumansIntubation, IntratrachealNurse AnesthetistsProspective Studiesairway managementemergency medical servicesintubation

Identifiers

PMID34152597
PMCPMC9291089
OpenAlexW3175468398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.