ArticleJournal, genetic engineering & biotechnology2021
Implications of targeted next-generation sequencing for bladder cancer: report of four cases.
Article in Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Germline Mutations in Female Breast Cancer Patients Using Next Generation Sequencing.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2026Article
- LncRNA TRPM2-AS promotes cell proliferation, migration, and invasion by regulating the miR-195-5p/COP1 axis in bladder cancer.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Article
- Comprehensive Analysis of Prognostic Alternative Splicing Signatures in Tumor Immune Infiltration in Bladder Cancer.Recent patents on anti-cancer drug discovery · 2025Article
- The S100 protein family in bladder cancer: mechanisms, clinical value, and targeted therapeutic prospects.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBladder cancer is considered heterogeneous diseases with two major subgroups: non-muscle- invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). It is a major healthcare problem, and it is one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide. Genetic mutations are not only a cause for carcinogenesis but are also a way for treatment strategy. The present study aimed to investigate breast cancer (BRCA genes) tumor suppressor gene mutations in bladder cancer tissue and combined blood samples for patients who developed secondary tumor after or during trimodal therapy. Fresh tissue samples and their matched blood samples were collected from four patients with bladder cancer. The objective regions for the examined genes (BRCA1 and BRCA2) were sequenced using next-generation sequencing (NGS); generated BAM files were uploaded to the cloud-based Ionreporter server, and the Oncomine BRCA-specific plugin was used to analyze the paired normal and tumor sample for each patient using the default plugin parameters.
resultsIntronic BRCA1 mutation c.5050-104 C >T was reported among the four investigated bladder cancer patients, and three somatic mutations were reported as follows: two of them were found to be benign rs1064793056 and rs28897679 on the Clinivar database and one nonsense pathogenic variant rs80357006. BRCA 2 gene mutation reported an exonic synonymous mutation rs397507876 in the tissue and germline DNA. Patients were treated with trimodal; however, three bladder cancer patients who reported BRCA mutations developed secondary tumors.
conclusionIdentification of mutational BRCA changes in bladder cancer is a promising marker for better treatment strategy. Further studies are encouraged on a large cohort of bladder cancer patients to confirm our findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.