Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34152507›Full record

ArticleCell and tissue banking2022

Development of sheep secondary follicles and preservation of aromatase and metalloproteinases 2 and 9 after vitrification and in vitro culture.

Francisco Denilson Rodrigues Gomes, Danielle Cristina Calado de Brito, Naíza Arcângela Ribeiro de Sá, Lucy Vanessa Sulca Ñaupas, Gaby Judith Quispe Palomino, Renato Felix da Silva, Éverton Pimentel Ferreira Lopes, Gildas Tetaping Mbemya, Benner Geraldo Alves, Mary Zelinski and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cell and tissue banking, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Francisco Denilson Rodrigues GomesLaboratory of Manipulation of Oocytes and Ovarian Pre-Antral Follicles (LAMOFOPA), Faculty of Veterinary, State University of Ceará, Av. Dr. Silas Munguba, 1700, Fortaleza, CE, CEP: 60714-903, Brazil.
Danielle Cristina Calado de BritoLaboratory of Manipulation of Oocytes and Ovarian Pre-Antral Follicles (LAMOFOPA), Faculty of Veterinary, State University of Ceará, Av. Dr. Silas Munguba, 1700, Fortaleza, CE, CEP: 60714-903, Brazil.
Naíza Arcângela Ribeiro de SáLaboratory of Manipulation of Oocytes and Ovarian Pre-Antral Follicles (LAMOFOPA), Faculty of Veterinary, State University of Ceará, Av. Dr. Silas Munguba, 1700, Fortaleza, CE, CEP: 60714-903, Brazil.
Lucy Vanessa Sulca ÑaupasLaboratory of Manipulation of Oocytes and Ovarian Pre-Antral Follicles (LAMOFOPA), Faculty of Veterinary, State University of Ceará, Av. Dr. Silas Munguba, 1700, Fortaleza, CE, CEP: 60714-903, Brazil.
Gaby Judith Quispe PalominoLaboratory of Manipulation of Oocytes and Ovarian Pre-Antral Follicles (LAMOFOPA), Faculty of Veterinary, State University of Ceará, Av. Dr. Silas Munguba, 1700, Fortaleza, CE, CEP: 60714-903, Brazil.
Renato Felix da SilvaLaboratory of Manipulation of Oocytes and Ovarian Pre-Antral Follicles (LAMOFOPA), Faculty of Veterinary, State University of Ceará, Av. Dr. Silas Munguba, 1700, Fortaleza, CE, CEP: 60714-903, Brazil.
Éverton Pimentel Ferreira LopesLaboratory of Manipulation of Oocytes and Ovarian Pre-Antral Follicles (LAMOFOPA), Faculty of Veterinary, State University of Ceará, Av. Dr. Silas Munguba, 1700, Fortaleza, CE, CEP: 60714-903, Brazil.
Gildas Tetaping MbemyaLaboratory of Manipulation of Oocytes and Ovarian Pre-Antral Follicles (LAMOFOPA), Faculty of Veterinary, State University of Ceará, Av. Dr. Silas Munguba, 1700, Fortaleza, CE, CEP: 60714-903, Brazil.
Benner Geraldo AlvesOvid Research Company, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Mary ZelinskiOregon National Primate Research Center, Beaverton, OR, USA.
José Ricardo de FigueiredoLaboratory of Manipulation of Oocytes and Ovarian Pre-Antral Follicles (LAMOFOPA), Faculty of Veterinary, State University of Ceará, Av. Dr. Silas Munguba, 1700, Fortaleza, CE, CEP: 60714-903, Brazil.
Ana Paula Ribeiro RodriguesLaboratory of Manipulation of Oocytes and Ovarian Pre-Antral Follicles (LAMOFOPA), Faculty of Veterinary, State University of Ceará, Av. Dr. Silas Munguba, 1700, Fortaleza, CE, CEP: 60714-903, Brazil. aprrodriguespapers@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4567-3236
Universidade Estadual do Ceará · BROregon National Primate Research Center · US

Funding

Upgrade of confocal microscopy at the Oregon National Primate Research CenterP51OD011092 · OD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Bonnie J. Nagel · 2012 to 2026
$203.9M
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 308.071/2016-6Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 433262/2016-8NIH HHS P51 OD011092Oregon National Primate Research Center NIH P51OD011092Oregon National Primate Research Center NIH R01HD083930
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cryopreservation of secondary follicles (SF) is a promising alternative to preserve the reproductive potential both in humans and animals in situations in which the transplantation of ovarian tissue is not possible. The objective of the present study was cryopreserved SF isolated sheep. Beyond follicular morphology, viability and development, we investigated proteins related to steroidogenic function and basement membrane remodeling [metalloproteinases 2 (MMP-2) and 9 (MMP-9)] in fresh SF (FSF) and vitrified SF (VSF) followed by in vitro culture for 6 (D6) or 12 days (D12). The percentage of intact follicles, follicular and oocyte diameter of the VSF were lower than FSF on both days of culture (P < 0.05). The VSF viability was statistically reduced from D6 (95.5%) to D12 (77.3%) but did not differ from the FSF on both days (D6:96.2% to D12:86.5%). Antrum formation in the VSF (D6: 59.13%; D12: 79.56%) was significantly lower than the FSF (D6: 79.61%; D12: 92.23%). However, an increase in this percentage was observed from D6 to D12 in both groups. Aromatase showed stronger labeling on FSF D6 and VSF D12 compared to other treatments (P < 0.05). MMP-2 showed a similar pattern of labeling in FSF D6 and VSF D12, similarly to that observed in FSF D12 and VSF D6. MMP-9 was similar in FSF and VSF cultivated for 6 and 12 days. In conclusion, VSF are able to grow and develop during 12 days of in vitro culture and showed evidence of preservation of steroidogenic function and remodeling of the basement membrane.

Indexed as

Matrix Metalloproteinase 9VitrificationAnimalsAromataseCryopreservationFemaleMatrix Metalloproteinase 2Ovarian FollicleSheepAromataseMatrix Metalloproteinase 2Matrix Metalloproteinase 9AromataseFertilityMetalloproteinasePreantral follicleVitrification

Identifiers

PMID34152507
OpenAlexW3177353111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.