Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34152504›Full record

ArticleJournal, genetic engineering & biotechnology2021

Comparison of matK and rbcL DNA barcodes for genetic classification of jewel orchid accessions in Vietnam.

Viet The Ho, Thi Kim Phuong Tran, Thi Thanh Tram Vu, Sasanti Widiarsih

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. UntanglingGenes · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Standardization ofACS omega · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Viet The HoHo Chi Minh City University of Food Industry, 140 Le Trong Tan, Tan Phu District, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. thehv@hufi.edu.vn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4863-0530
Thi Kim Phuong TranHo Chi Minh City University of Food Industry, 140 Le Trong Tan, Tan Phu District, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Thi Thanh Tram VuHo Chi Minh City University of Food Industry, 140 Le Trong Tan, Tan Phu District, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Sasanti WidiarsihPlant Mutation Breeding Division, Centre for Isotopes and Radiation Application, National Nuclear Energy Agency, Jl. Lebakbulus Raya No. 49, South Jakarta, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundJewel orchid is the common name of several orchid species which can be alike in morphological characteristics, but variable in medicinal properties. At present, two DNA barcode loci, namely, maturase K (matK) and ribulose 1,5-biphosphate carboxylase (rbcL), are intensively utilized for plant identification. However, the discrimination effectiveness of these loci is variable among plant species. This study was carried out to compare the identifying efficacy of these two loci on jewel orchid population collected throughout Vietnam.

resultsThe results revealed that 21 jewel orchid accessions studied were segregated into four different species with significant variations. The discrimination power of matK and rbcL markers in this jewel orchid study displayed different efficiency level. The rbcL gene has higher distinguishing potential than either matK gene alone or the combination of both genes.

conclusionThe findings of this project could provide valuable information that is necessary for classification, plant origin identification, breeding, and conservation program of jewel orchid in Vietnam.

Indexed as

DNA barcodeGenetic diversityJewel orchidmatKrbcL

Identifiers

PMID34152504
PMCPMC8217478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.