ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2021
Taking Care of Those Who Care: Attending Psychological Needs of Health Workers in a Hospital in Madrid (Spain) During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05720429 (Evaluation of the Usefulness and Feasibility of a Psychoeducational Intervention to Prevent the Negative Psychological Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Primary Health Care Professionals), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of the Usefulness and Feasibility of a Psychoeducational Intervention to Prevent the Negative Psychological Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Primary Health Care Professionals
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and piloting of a self-care psychoeducation program for mental health professionals.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Violence in Healthcare Workers Is Associated with Disordered Eating.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Prevalence and correlates of severe anxiety among front-line nurses during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: a large-scale multi-center study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Article
- Exploring coping strategies of emergency medical technicians against COVID-19 stress: a qualitative study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Managing the Mental Health of Healthcare Professionals in Times of Crisis: The Aruban COVID-19 Experience.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Assessment of Resilience Training for Hospital Employees in the Era of COVID-19.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on primary care workers: a cross-sectional study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewWe aim to review evidence of the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare professionals and the effects of the psychological crisis interventions and measures implemented to manage stress. RECENT
findingsMental health problems are frequently encountered in health professionals during emergencies and often prevail over the following years. Results show health professionals exhibited symptoms of depression, anxiety, emotional distress, burnout, post-traumatic stress and poor sleep quality. In response to acute responses to stress, it is crucial to provide psychoeducation, mindfulness and coping resources. These interventions can improve resilience and self-efficacy of professionals, as well as help to prevent anxiety, depression and quality of sleep. The need for intervention programmes targeting the mental health of vulnerable populations has been widely acknowledged. We described a psychological support plan designed and implemented with the aim of providing mental health care for health professionals. Such programmes should be easily accessible to professionals, preferably in their own work environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.