ReviewDer Pathologe2021
[Homologous recombination repair deficiency as a predictive biomarker : Basic mechanisms and detection methods].
Review in Der Pathologe, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Ovarian cancer: molecular pathology and molecularly targeted therapy].Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- Increased HRD score in cisplatin resistant penile cancer cells.BMC cancer · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDNA double-strand breaks may evoke cell death or cancer. Cells have developed two fundamentally different mechanisms of DNA double-strand repair: the accurate mechanism of homologous recombination repair and the error-prone nonhomologous end joining. The deficiency of homologous recombination repair (HRD) is a frequent feature of several solid tumor entities and is associated with sensitivity to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor therapy.
objectivesAmong other biomarkers, HRD testing provides an opportunity to guide PARP inhibitor therapy in solid tumors, but the basic principles are complex and the use and benefits of the different methodologies remain controversial. Knowledge of the underlying mechanisms at the molecular level will advance our understanding and will pave the way to introduce the testing of new biomarkers.
methodsAn overview of the fundamental mechanisms of DNA repair is provided. Important terms like HRR, HRD, and BRCAness are defined, and analysis methods are described, especially with regard to their integration in molecular pathology routine diagnostics.
resultsCurrently, at least testing of the BRCA mutation status and genomic instability using a composite HRD score should be implemented in laboratories to identify subgroups of patients who might benefit from PARP inhibitor therapies. A broad range of testing methods is available with pros and cons for introduction in the clinical setting. They have to be validated carefully to reliably inform treatment selection.
conclusionsBiomarkers to identify current homologous recombination deficiency status are needed to predict the benefit from PARP inhibitors and stratify their use in clinical management. Besides commercial assays, different tests might be used for the analysis of HRD. The application depends, among other things, on the local situation and has to be extensively validated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.