Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34152437›Full record

ReviewPediatric radiology2022

Magnetic resonance imaging of Müllerian anomalies in girls: concepts and controversies.

Amanda G Rivas, Monica Epelman, Pamela I Ellsworth, Daniel J Podberesky, Sharon W Gould

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Amanda G RivasDepartment of Radiology, Nemours Children's Health System/Nemours Children's Hospital, 13535 Nemours Parkway, Orlando, FL, 32827, USA.
Monica EpelmanDepartment of Radiology, Nemours Children's Health System/Nemours Children's Hospital, 13535 Nemours Parkway, Orlando, FL, 32827, USA. monica.epelman@nemours.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5311-3031
Pamela I EllsworthDivision of Urology, Nemours Children's Hospital, Orlando, FL, USA.
Daniel J PodbereskyDepartment of Radiology, Nemours Children's Health System/Nemours Children's Hospital, 13535 Nemours Parkway, Orlando, FL, 32827, USA.
Sharon W GouldDepartment of Radiology, Nemours Children's Health System/Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, DE, USA.
University of Central Florida · USAlfred I. duPont Hospital for Children · USNemours Children's Clinic · USNemours Children's Health System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Female Müllerian anomalies are the result of failure of formation, fusion or resorption of the Müllerian ducts and are relatively common, with a prevalence of 5.5-7.0% in the general population. While some of these anomalies are asymptomatic, those presenting with obstruction require accurate identification for optimal clinical management including potential surgical treatment. MRI is a useful adjunct to sonography in the evaluation of Müllerian anomalies, typically allowing a more complete characterization of the malformation. Technical aspects, embryologic concepts and controversies regarding classification systems are highlighted in this review. Several Müllerian anomalies are discussed and illustrated in more detail utilizing various cases with pelvic MRI studies.

Indexed as

UterusVaginaFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMullerian DuctsUltrasonographyChildrenCongenitalMagnetic resonance imagingMüllerian anomaliesUltrasoundUterusVagina

Identifiers

PMID34152437
OpenAlexW3173764842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.