ArticleArchives of microbiology2021
Bacterial community analysis on Sclerotium-suppressive soil.
Article in Archives of microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of preceding crops on potassium dynamics, bacterial communities in tobacco-planted soils, and potassium allocation in tobacco plants.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Transplantation of soil from organic field confers disease suppressive ability to conducive soil.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Difficulties in controlling the soil-borne plant pathogenic fungus Sclerotium rolfsii favoured the analysis of its suppressive soil for better understanding. In the present study, culture-independent molecular technique was used to analyse the bacterial communities of suppressive soil and conducive soil. Hence, metagenomic DNAs from both kinds of soils were directly extracted and their sequence polymorphism was analysed by targeting hypervariable domains, V4 + V5, of the 16S rRNA gene. The results of 16S rRNA gene-driven bacterial community diversity analysis along with soil physicochemical and biological properties clearly discriminated S. rolfsii suppressive soil from conducive soil. The dominant phylogenetic group of suppressive soil is Actinobacteria followed by Proteobacteria. The other groups include Acidobacteria, Firmicutes and Cyanobacteria. In contrast, conducive soil had very few Actinobacterial sequences and was dominated by Gamma- and Betaproteobacteria. Based on the relative proportion of different bacterial communities, their diversity and species richness were observed more in suppressive soil than in conducive soil. The present study identifies the dominant bacterial community which shares S. rolfsii suppressiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34152425What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.