Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34152413›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2021

Long Reads Are Revolutionizing 20 Years of Insect Genome Sequencing.

Scott Hotaling, John S Sproul, Jacqueline Heckenhauer, Ashlyn Powell, Amanda M Larracuente, Steffen U Pauls, Joanna L Kelley, Paul B Frandsen

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The T2T Genome of the Domesticated SilkwormInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Scott HotalingSchool of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5965-0986
John S SproulDepartment of Biology, University of Rochester, New York, USA.
Jacqueline HeckenhauerLOEWE Centre for Translational Biodiversity Genomics (LOEWE-TBG), Frankfurt, Germany.
Ashlyn PowellDepartment of Plant and Wildlife Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA.
Amanda M LarracuenteDepartment of Biology, University of Rochester, New York, USA.
Steffen U PaulsLOEWE Centre for Translational Biodiversity Genomics (LOEWE-TBG), Frankfurt, Germany.
Joanna L KelleySchool of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7731-605X
Paul B FrandsenLOEWE Centre for Translational Biodiversity Genomics (LOEWE-TBG), Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4801-7579

Funding

The evolutionary and functional genomics of satellite DNAR35GM119515 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Amanda Marie Larracuente · 2016 to 2026
$4.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM119515
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The first insect genome assembly (Drosophila melanogaster) was published two decades ago. Today, nuclear genome assemblies are available for a staggering 601 insect species representing 20 orders. In this study, we analyzed the most-contiguous assembly for each species and provide a "state-of-the-field" perspective, emphasizing taxonomic representation, assembly quality, gene completeness, and sequencing technologies. Relative to species richness, genomic efforts have been biased toward four orders (Diptera, Hymenoptera, Collembola, and Phasmatodea), Coleoptera are underrepresented, and 11 orders still lack a publicly available genome assembly. The average insect genome assembly is 439.2 Mb in length with 87.5% of single-copy benchmarking genes intact. Most notable has been the impact of long-read sequencing; assemblies that incorporate long reads are ∼48× more contiguous than those that do not. We offer four recommendations as we collectively continue building insect genome resources: 1) seek better integration between independent research groups and consortia, 2) balance future sampling between filling taxonomic gaps and generating data for targeted questions, 3) take advantage of long-read sequencing technologies, and 4) expand and improve gene annotations.

Indexed as

Drosophila melanogasterHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingAnimalsGenome, InsectGenomicsSequence Analysis, DNAArthropodaarthropod genomicsInsectalong-read sequencingOxford NanoporePacific Biosciences

Identifiers

PMID34152413
PMCPMC8358217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.