Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34152397›Full record

ArticleArchives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists2022

Inter-lateral Referral of Sensation in Health and Disease Using a Mirror Illusion-A Scoping Review.

Annegret Hagenberg, Dave G Lambert, Shifa Jussab, John Maltby, Thompson G Robinson

Open access · bronzeAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 88% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Annegret HagenbergDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Dave G LambertDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Shifa JussabDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
John MaltbyDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Thompson G RobinsonDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
University of Leicester · GBHochschule Fresenius · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePerception of touch is expected at the location where it is applied. However, there are indications that being touched may be perceived on the contralateral side when seen as a reflection in a mirror at midline. Such inter-lateral referral of sensation (RS) lacks evidence, as mirror therapy research usually focusses on movement-based techniques. This study aimed to map out existing research across disciplines regarding the effect of RS in health and disease, and to understand whether there is rehabilitation potential in RS.

methodA scoping review was conducted to map out concepts and keywords across disciplines interested in this topic, using keywords in several languages, and a wide range of databases and additional sources.

resultsThe review revealed mostly cross-sectional experiments and included over 486 participants: healthy, or with stroke, complex regional pain syndrome, amputation, nerve graft surgery or radial fracture. Procedures varied regarding stimulation tool, time and location, with two stimulating replacements, one the face and one a variety of areas. Response rates ranged from 0 to 100%.In general, RS was regarded as a phenomenon or even as a predictor of maladaptive neuroplasticity. There was little research into using RS stimulation as a modulatory tool to improve sensory perception.

conclusionsRS challenges the understanding of touch perception and elicits a range of questions regarding neuro-processing. A modulatory approach using RS has not been described, requires investigation and, if promising, development as an intervention.

Indexed as

IllusionsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansNeuropsychological TestsReferral and ConsultationTouchCerebrovascular disease/accident and strokeDisability/handicapsIntersensory ProcessesMirror TherapyPerception/spatial processingReferral of Sensation

Identifiers

PMID34152397
PMCPMC9113492
OpenAlexW3173326764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.