Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34151852›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuromuscular diseases2021

The Minimal Clinical Important Difference (MCID) in Annual Rate of Change of Timed Function Tests in Boys with DMD.

Tina Duong, Jennifer Canbek, Marisa Birkmeier, Leslie Nelson, Catherine Siener, Alicia Fernandez-Fernandez, Erik Henricson, Craig M McDonald, Heather Gordish-Dressman, CINRG-DNHS Investigators

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuromuscular diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Tina DuongDepartment of Neurology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Jennifer CanbekPhysical Therapy Department, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA.
Marisa BirkmeierDepartment of Health, Human Function, and Rehabilitation Sciences, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
Leslie NelsonDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Catherine SienerDepartment of Neurology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Alicia Fernandez-FernandezPhysical Therapy Department, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA.
Erik HenricsonUniversity of California Davis Health, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Sacramento CA, USA.
Craig M McDonaldUniversity of California Davis Health, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Sacramento CA, USA.
Heather Gordish-DressmanChildren's National Medical Center, Department of Biostatistics, Washington DC, USA.
CINRG-DNHS Investigators
Nova Southeastern University · USChildren's National · USGeorge Washington University · USStanford University · USUniversity of California, Davis · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a rare x-linked recessive genetic disorder affecting 1 in every 5000-10000 [1, 2]. This disease leads to a variable but progressive sequential pattern of muscle weakness that eventually causes loss of important functional milestones such as the ability to walk. With promising drugs in development to ameliorate the effects of muscle weakness, these treatments must be associated with a clinically meaningful functional change.

objectiveThe objective of this analysis is to determine both distribution, minimal detectable change (MDC), and anchor-based, minimal clinically important difference, (MCID) of 12 month change values in standardized time function tests (TFT) used to monitor disease progression in DMD.

methodThis is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from a multi-center prospective natural history study with the Cooperative International Neuromuscular Research Group (CINRG). This study calculated MDC and MCID values for 3 commonly used timed function tests typically used to monitor disease progression; supine to stand (STS), 10 meter walk/run (10MWT), and 4 stair climb (4SC). MDC used standard error of measurement (SEM) while MCID measurements used the Vignos scale as an anchor to determine clinical change in functional status.

resultsAll 3 TFT were significantly important clinical endpoints to detect MDC and MCID changes. MDC and MCID 12 month changes were significant in 10MWT (-0.138, -0.212), Supine to Stand (-0.026, -0.023) and 4 stair climb (-0.034, -0.035) with an effect size greater or close to 0.2.

conclusionThe 3 TFT are clinically meaningful endpoints used to establish change in DMD. MCID values were higher than MDC values indicating that an anchor-based approach using Vignos as a clinically meaningful loss of lower extremity abilities is appropriate to assess change in boys with DMD.

Indexed as

Minimal Clinically Important DifferenceChildDisease ProgressionHumansMaleMuscular Dystrophy, DuchenneProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesDuchenne muscular dystrophyMCIDtime function tests

Identifiers

PMID34151852
PMCPMC8673528
OpenAlexW3177435603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.