Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34151755›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2021

Healthy eating strategies for socioeconomically disadvantaged populations: a meta-ethnography.

Christina Gillies, Sabina Super, Hedwig Te Molder, Kees de Graaf, Annemarie Wagemakers

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. A Realist Scoping Review of Community Nutrition Interventions in the UK: Implications for the 'Nutrition Skills for Life' Programme.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christina GilliesStrategic Communication Chair Group, Department of Social Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6508-7296
Sabina SuperHealth and Society Chair Group, Department of Social Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2586-1953
Hedwig Te MolderDepartment of Language, Literature, and Communication, Faculty of Humanities, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0599-8338
Kees de GraafHuman Nutrition & Health Chair Group, Department of Agrotechnology and Food Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5748-6916
Annemarie WagemakersHealth and Society Chair Group, Department of Social Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1212-6888
Wageningen University & Research · NLVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Diet, HealthyVulnerable PopulationsAnthropology, CulturalDietHealth EducationHumansdisadvantaged populationshealthy eatinginterventionslow socioeconomic statusMeta-ethnographyqualitative reviewqualitative synthesisstrategies

Identifiers

PMID34151755
PMCPMC8216252
OpenAlexW3173982545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.