Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34151511›Full record

ReviewNutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia2021

Internal coherence matters: Lessons for nutrition and dietetics research.

Claire Palermo, Dianne P Reidlinger, Charlotte E Rees

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Exploring the perceptions of Chinese adults toward overweight and obesity: A systematic literature review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Promoting Planetary Health, One Bite at a Time: Examining the Efficacy and Feasibility of a Dietary Behaviour Change Intervention.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
  3. Beyond Taste and Nutrition Food Dimensions Addressed in Dietetic Consultations With Malnourished Home-Dwelling Older Adults: A Qualitative Study.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A qualitative approach to understanding quality symptom management in routine oncology outpatient care: phase 1 of the symptom pathways project.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Beyond Local Champions: Contextual Factors Shaping the Implementation of Healthy Eating Interventions in Centre-Based Care - A Qualitative Study With Educators and Cooks.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  16. Navigating challenges and adherence in time-restricted eating: A qualitative study.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Experiences of Dietetic Students Taking Part in an Online Longitudinal Dementia Educational Programme: A Qualitative Study.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Claire PalermoMonash Centre for Scholarship in Health Education (MCSHE), Faculty of Medicine, Nursing & Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9423-5067
Dianne P ReidlingerFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Robina, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9993-8239
Charlotte E ReesMonash Centre for Scholarship in Health Education (MCSHE), Faculty of Medicine, Nursing & Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4828-1422

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimInternal coherence in research refers to the alignment between ontology (nature of reality), epistemology (nature of knowledge), axiology (values), methodology and methods and is an important but often overlooked element of research quality. We therefore aimed to illustrate the concept of internal coherence in nutrition and dietetics research, and its importance beyond individual elements of study quality.

methodA targeted literature search in Nutrition and Dietetics was used to identify research illustrating one example of three main approaches to research (scientific, interpretive and critical inquiry) published between November 2017 and November 2020. Studies were included if they related to education research based on the expertise of the authors, and illustrated diverse points about internal coherence. The authors independently critiqued included studies for internal coherence and synthesised their findings.

resultsFrom 76 manuscripts, 14 were identified as describing education research. Of the three selected studies that were critiqued, all had elements of internal coherence, in particular alignment between epistemology and methodology. However, each had elements of misalignment too, specifically between epistemology, axiology and method. The results point to the profession's historical groundings privileging the scientific approach, showing how this can yield misalignments, particularly when describing the limitations of interpretive and critical inquiry approaches.

conclusionThis review demonstrates the importance of internal coherence as a marker of quality, over and above existing quality assessment checklists for qualitative and quantitative methodologies. As such, it can help authors, reviewers and editors to improve the quality of nutrition and dietetics research and its reporting.

Indexed as

DieteticsHumansNutritional StatusResearch Designeditorial policiesepistemologymethodspeer reviewqualitative researchsocial research

Identifiers

PMID34151511
PMCPMC8361966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.