ArticleDiabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders2021
A Claims-Based Cohort Study on the Treatment Patterns of Japanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and the Association of Early First Physician Visit with Time to Prescription of Oral Hypoglycemic Agents.
Article in Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nonlinear modeling of health checkup factors and future claims-based healthcare costs in Japan: a retrospective cohort study.Health economics review · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Based Prediction for Incident Hypertension Based on Regular Health Checkup Data: Derivation and Validation in 2 Independent Nationwide Cohorts in South Korea and Japan.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis study aimed to investigate the relationships between timing of the first physician visit after detection of an abnormal glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) value at routine annual check and the time to antidiabetic treatment prescription; and understand treatment patterns in patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
methodsThis retrospective, longitudinal, observational cohort study examined data from JMDC Inc., an administrative claims database. Patients with HbA1c value of at least 6.5% at routine annual check, aged 20 years or older, and prescribed at least one antidiabetic drug were included. This cohort was classified into early physician visit and delayed physician visit groups based on the timing of the first physician visit relative to the median. Patients were monitored from the date of first HbA1c checkup of at least 6.5% to the date of first physician visit with an HbA1c test, and from the date of the first physician visit to the date of prescription of first-line and second-line T2DM treatments. The time to first prescription of antidiabetic treatment for the two groups was then compared.
resultsOf 4798 eligible patients, 54.8% were prescribed first-line T2DM therapy less than 2 months from the first physician visit for T2DM diagnosis. A lower percentage of the early group compared with the delayed group required T2DM pharmacological therapy in less than 2 months (46.1% vs. 63.4%). The early group had a longer median time to prescription of first-line therapy [92 days vs. 15 days, p < 0.0001; hazard ratio (HR) 1.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24, 1.39] and second-line therapy (1599 days vs. 1315 days, p < 0.0001; HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.11, 1.34) compared with the delayed group.
conclusionIn Japanese patients with T2DM, early physician visit after abnormal HbA1c detection at routine annual check is associated with a longer period before T2DM medication requirement, and may improve disease course.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.