Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34151405›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021

Conflicts and ecological footprint in MENA countries: implications for sustainable terrestrial ecosystem.

Ojonugwa Usman, Abdulkadir Abdulrashid Rafindadi, Samuel Asumadu Sarkodie

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ojonugwa UsmanSchool of Business Education, Federal College of Education (Technical), Yobe State, Potiskum, Nigeria. usmanojonugwa@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6459-9898
Abdulkadir Abdulrashid RafindadiDepartment of Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences, Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto, Nigeria.
Samuel Asumadu SarkodieNord University Business School (HHN), Post Box 1490, 8049, Bodø, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conflicts are socio-political pressures that alter wellbeing, social structure, and economic sustenance. However, very limited studies have assessed the long-term impact of conflicts on environmental sustainability. This study investigates the role of internal and external conflicts on ecological footprint in the Middle East and North African countries (MENA) over the period 1995-2016. Here, we test whether the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis is valid for MENA countries during the period of internal and external conflicts-characterized by energy disasters and deteriorating income levels. Using robust econometric tools based on 12 MENA countries, the results show that income growth has negative impact with evidence of inherent heterogeneity across quantile distribution of ecological footprint. However, the positive impact of the square term of income decreases ecological footprint, thus, confirming U-shaped relationship between income and environmental indicator across MENA countries. The results further show that excessive energy consumption is attributed to a rising level of urbanization, while increase in conflicts  stimulates environmental degradation. These findings are essential for effective conflict resolution and environmental policies across conflict-prone countries.

Indexed as

Economic DevelopmentEcosystemCarbon DioxideEnvironmental PolicyUrbanizationCarbon DioxideConflictsEcological footprintEnvironmental sustainabilityMENA countriesPanel quantile

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.