Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34151283›Full record

ArticleCritical care explorations2021

Physical Functioning After Admission to the PICU: A Scoping Review.

Daniël Bossen, Rosa M de Boer, Hendrika Knoester, Jolanda M Maaskant, Marike van der Schaaf, Mattijs W Alsem, Reinoud J B J Gemke, Job B M van Woensel, Jaap Oosterlaan, Raoul H H Engelbert

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care explorations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Beyond Staying Alive….Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Promoting Functional Recovery in Critically Ill Children.Pediatric clinics of North America · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Daniël BossenCentre of Expertise Urban Vitality, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rosa M de BoerCentre of Expertise Urban Vitality, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hendrika KnoesterPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jolanda M MaaskantDepartment of Pediatrics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marike van der SchaafCentre of Expertise Urban Vitality, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mattijs W AlsemDepartment of Rehabilitation, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Reinoud J B J GemkeReproduction and Development, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Job B M van WoenselPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jaap OosterlaanDepartment of Pediatrics, Emma Neuroscience Group, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Raoul H H EngelbertCentre of Expertise Urban Vitality, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo conduct a scoping review to 1) describe findings and determinants of physical functioning in children during and/or after PICU stay, 2) identify which domains of physical functioning are measured, 3) and synthesize the clinical and research knowledge gaps. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Cochrane Library databases following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. STUDY SELECTION: Two investigators independently screened and included studies against predetermined criteria. DATA EXTRACTION: One investigator extracted data with review by a second investigator. A narrative analyses approach was used. DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 2,610 articles were identified, leaving 68 studies for inclusion. Post-PICU/hospital discharge scores show that PICU survivors report difficulties in physical functioning during and years after PICU stay. Although sustained improvements in the long-term have been reported, most of the reported levels were lower compared with the reference and baseline values. Decreased physical functioning was associated with longer hospital stay and presence of comorbidities. A diversity of instruments was used in which mobility and self-care were mostly addressed.

conclusionsThe results show that children perceive moderate to severe difficulties in physical functioning during and years after PICU stay. Longitudinal assessments during and after PICU stay should be incorporated, especially for children with a higher risk for poor functional outcomes. There is need for consensus on the most suitable methods to assess physical functioning in children admitted to the PICU.

Indexed as

childrenclinical outcomespediatric intensive carepediatric postintensive care syndromephysical functioning

Identifiers

PMID34151283
PMCPMC8208450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.