ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2021
Multi skin lesions classification using fine-tuning and data-augmentation applying NASNet.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- XAI-MedNet: A Next-Generation Explainable AI Framework for Contrast-Enhanced Skin Lesion Classification via Entropy-Controlled Optimization.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Review of CNN-Based Approaches for Preprocessing, Segmentation and Classification of Knee Osteoarthritis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Enhancing geotechnical damage detection with deep learning: a convolutional neural network approach.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Dermatology Image Analysis: Current Developments and Future Trends.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Artificial intelligence for assessing the severity of microtiaFrontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skin lesions are one of the typical symptoms of many diseases in humans and indicative of many types of cancer worldwide. Increased risks caused by the effects of climate change and a high cost of treatment, highlight the importance of skin cancer prevention efforts like this. The methods used to detect these diseases vary from a visual inspection performed by dermatologists to computational methods, and the latter has widely used automatic image classification applying Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) in medical image analysis in the last few years. This article presents an approach that uses CNNs with a NASNet architecture to recognize in a more accurate way, without segmentation, eight skin diseases. The model was trained end-to-end on Keras with augmented skin diseases images from the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC). The CNN architectures were initialized with weight from ImageNet, fine-tuned in order to discriminate well among the different types of skin lesions, and then 10-fold cross-validation was applied. Finally, some evaluation metrics are calculated as accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity and compare with other CNN trained architectures. This comparison shows that the proposed system offers higher accuracy results, with a significant reduction on the training paraments. To the best of our knowledge and based in the state-of-art recompiling in this work, the application of the NASNet architecture training with skin image lesion from ISIC archive for multi-class classification and evaluated by cross-validation, represents a novel skin disease classification system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.