ArticleEndoscopy international open2020
Erratum: Efficacy and safety of gastric exposed endoscopic full-thickness resection without laparoscopic assistance: a systematic review.
Article in Endoscopy international open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility of embryonic-natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for submucosal tumors with mucosal preservation in beagle model.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Adaptation of endoscopic submucosal dissection techniques for endoscopic full-thickness resection: a review of key steps and technical aspects.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2024Review
- Article
- Exposed endoscopic full-thickness resection for duodenal submucosal tumors: Current status and future perspectives.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2022Review
- Gastrointestinal exposed endoscopic full-thickness resection in the era of endoscopic suturing: a retrospective single-center case series.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1055/a-1198-4357.].
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.